these brands. the most powerful brands on the world people use not further utility but for their identity congruent. as a way of signaling to the world who they are as identity projects. so the things you are seeing pushed back from the opposition s adina won their identity associated with them. but there are more people who not only want their identity associated with these efforts, but they also are consuming and advocating for the brand. that s far more powerful than day-to-day commerce through seeing right now today. when you think about brand, you have to think about the long term. what does it mean to these people in our hearts and minds? and overtime, how are these people gonna consume? how are they gonna advocate as weiser projecting whose they who they are in their identity project? duda it s like you said, mike, is it s hearts and minds. we are humans. we re irrational creatures. so it s like, marcus, you re absolutely right, i just bought your book, foreign to reading i
who they are in their identity project? duda it s like you said, mike, is it s hearts and minds. we are humans. we re irrational creatures. so it s like, marcus, you re absolutely right, i just bought your book, foreign to reading it. it s great bland are worth more on wall street than things that might be a better product or service. great brands have values. great brands are things that, it s what you say about it when you leave the room kind of thing. but what happens when values or culture is evolving and changing? and brands are trying to move with them? and suddenly people are getting angry? you can move with them, but your cistern for what you are. you can t fake that. the chick-fil-a, just to upset some people, came out so we can they hired a dni person, they re getting work. people went nuts. i m gonna boycott. the no newsroom for some two
given the backdrop that we re looking at right now. but of course, theyjust wanted to call in one person, donald tusk, and they are inventing those paranoid, paranoid conspiracy theories. and, of course, it is a political tool. we do have our prosecutors. we do have ourjudges and our courts. and they should be the ones, if there is any allegation of misconduct, to be able to actually prosecute the case and then decide in the face of law in our courts and this kind of special committee of parliament with special powers, this is like a bolshevik measure. it has nothing to do with democracy. 0k. and the government clearly challenged that and say that this is very necessary and russian influence really does need to be investigated. now, we understand president duda s now asked for the law to be changed. does that address some of the concerns that you have then? well, that was very strange because the president didn t veto this act. he could have done it. he simply accepted it. and then aft
he says he ll give them to the investigation directly. a woman in her 70s has died, after being attacked by a dog in warwickshire on friday. a 52 year old man and a 49 year old woman have been arrested on suspicion of owning a banned breed and having a dog dangerously out of control. police say the animal has been siezed. to poland, where thousands of polish government opponents are demonstrating in warsaw against a new law that critics say could be used to target opposition politicians in an election year. the law sets up a commission to investigate undue russian influence in polish politics since 2007. it has the power to, in effect, ban people from public office. president duda has proposed amending this. but critics say it could still be used against people including the main opposition leader and former prime minister, donald tusk. 0ur europe regional editor danny aeberhard joins us
measure. it has nothing to do with democracy- measure. it has nothing to do with democra . ,., . ., , democracy. the government clearly challen . e democracy. the government clearly challenge that. democracy. the government clearly challenge that, and democracy. the government clearly challenge that, and say democracy. the government clearly challenge that, and say that - democracy. the government clearly challenge that, and say that this - democracy. the government clearly challenge that, and say that this is l challenge that, and say that this is very necessary, and russian influence really does need to be investigated. we understand president duda has addressed the law and said it has needed to be changed. does that address and of your concerns? it is changed. does that address and of your concerns? your concerns? it is interesting, because he your concerns? it is interesting, because he could your concerns? it is interesting, because he could have - your concerns? it is