when the shot was fired. there s a lot that needs to be gone through when trying to recreate the situation that existed throughout the entire event from the time they first attempted to stop him to the time the shooting actually took place. so, there s a lot of work that needs to be done. it s just too early to draw conclusions. my biggest concern is the number of shots fired and whether or not all those shots were justified by every single officer. that s an average of slightly over seven shots per person that took place. that s a lot of that s a lot of shots. you have to look at when you look at these types of cases, was the use of force necessary? was it proceed poersal? was it objectively reasonable? that s when you take a look at the proportionality of it. was it reasonable to continue firing? those are all questions that have to be answered. that question of proportionality is going to be key. charles ramsey, appreciate your time as always, sir. thanks. new day continue
so why why why would this come out? w i don t know.e i think that they think that we re also stupid. we ll just believe anything. i mean, the study makes no sense. did you read how it was actually conducted to do actually yeah. it s well, they just went back in time and did a some correlate you know, cherry picked data, did correlationsnd and came up with this. i don t s even known what the point of the study ish because it doesn t really matchr with any of their goals. it s noty very good science. it st not really science at all. it s junk science. you know, science would be to p use the data they had and makere predictions about the future, doingngdre not really that . they just wantaw to draw conclusions. now, you know, the most active hurricane period in the united states was from 1770 toat 1780 to the revolutionary war before cheeseburgers, suvs, copelands and you know, where w were all the hurricane? well, the hurricanes were there ,but now they re not.st so the study really mak
turning to the latest on covid, there are signs that omicron is fading, infections are declining across the u.s., while deaths continue to rise. there is plenty of covid to go around. in fact, we continue to see different lab studies deal with learning about this evolving and mutating virus. there s a new one raising lots of interest. 33 scientists finding that cbd can prevent covid from replicating. they observed real-life patients. experts say a clinical trial could be needed to draw conclusions. this is a study about learning what s working, it is not advice about what to take to fight covid at this juncture. now, one of the researchers from the cbd study joins us right now. glenn randall is a professor at the university of chicago. welcome.
deposition. hypocrisy aside, if trump takes the fifth can t that be used against him in a civil case or in civil cases? right. it can be used that is you can tell the jury that he took the fifth and allow the jury to basically take whatever it wants, make whatever conclusions, draw conclusions from that. that is that he is hiding something. and, you know, all of our constitutional right. perfectly fine. but this is just so viewers understand, a civil case all that can happen is money damages or an injunction. so it would be paying back, say, new york state for not paying enough taxes for example or being forced to do something or not to do something. that s really different from the criminal context which of course can put someone in jail. so one of their primary arguments was, well, the new york or the manhattan da is at the same time looking into
right. can be used, that is you can tell the jury that he took the fifth and allow the jury to basically take whatever it wants, make whatever conclusions, draw conclusions from that, that is that he s hiding something. it s our constitutional right. it s perfectly fine. a civil case, all that can happen from a civil case is money damages or an injunction. so, paying back new york state for not paying enough taxes, for example or being forced to do something or not to do something. that s different from the criminal context, which can put someone in jail. one of their primary arguments is the manhattan d.a. is looking into criminal allegations and this isn t fair we have to speak in a civil deposition beforehand. this is where the judge said listen, this is a legitimate investigation.