musk s jet. the real controversy, i guess, is he says he s in favor of free speech, the first amendment. but now he s very selectively shutting people down. well, and i think what it seems to be is what he would argue is he s not in favor of any speech that would endanger his family. and he believes that by putting out the information about his private jets, apparently, that or his private jet, that that endangers his family. and that s where the crux is here. and the question musk has been running a poll today asking twitter followers whether these journalists should be suspended just for seven days or whether they should be reinstated now. we will see what if anything he does today regarding this, but he had a twitter space event, he
at this point. the vote last night to give themselves another week to finish should provide some breathing room, but as you pointed out, we re dealing with a bill that s about $1.7 trillion with a t and other than the top line numbers, very little information about it is public. very few sort of firm decisions made, the cliche you often hear in discussions about an omnibus package is no one individual element is final until everything is final. there are constant back and forth negotiations, particularly on the other policy pieces that go along side by side with the funding parts. the things i m looking closely at are things like the electoral count act provision meant to prevent another january 6th. that does appear likely to ride along with this bill. will there be extra money for ukraine and the war there? the answer appears to be yes, but how much? i couldn t tell you. this is a kind of decisions that are still being made over the course of this weekend as the bill gets written b
suspended, he tweeted the facebook link to that account you mentioned, elon jet. and he thinks that s what prompted his suspension. but the really interesting thing about it is, the information about elon musk s private jet is public information. if you want to find it, you can get it. and that s true not just for elon musk s private jet but for anyone s private jet. and so you have this argument now over, you know, what musk says is doxing, and that is using public information to threaten someone in a malicious way, and what this journalist, aaron says is, look, it s just public information. he said more than that, i didn t even tweet out the jet number or where it was or anything. all i did was tweet a link to the facebook link to the facebook page that follows elon
called into a twitter space event last night and said look, journalists are no different from the general public, and if you put out doxing information, your account will be suspended. and because twitter is a private entity, he gets to decide what is doxing information. and apparently, doxing information under his definition is information about his private jet. andrea. anne thompson, you cleared it all up. thank you. i hope so. russia launched a new wave of missile attacks on kyiv and other ukrainian cities this morning. right now, he s getting up to speak at this veterans event. so let s let s listen in to the president. who are you talking about? i m talking about my buddy, dear friend.
outstanding questions in what was not released, the redacted documents? i think two things. i think the future documents may actually show us a little bit more about this, but it will never settle the question for everyone. one is, you know, oswald was an amazingly close touch with people from the soviet union. not only as a defector to the soviet union, redefected, but also went to the soviet embassy in mexico and the same thing with the cuban embassy. lbj in 1963 dealing with all of this, the last think he would have wanted was to have a lot of information out at that time suggesting that oswald may have acted on behalf of the soviets and the cubans because, as johnson said in his private tapes, americans will demand that i get into a war that could kill 60 million people. so he saw it as a political problem. the other side of this was that