A news and interview program, anchored by Erin Burnett. Latest offer for an interview in the Russia Investigation. And tonight the Washington Post is reporting muellers most recent offer would cut the number of questions to the president in the interview about Obstruction Of Justice by nearly half. Cutting it by nearly half is not good enough for the president. Obstruction in any form is Something Team trump has been very clear is a nonstarter. You said what the president would be willing to sit down sort of figure out in the area of collusion, not obstruction. Meaning he would answer questions about collusion, not obstruction or vice versa . No, collusion, not obstruction. So, very clear, right . Not obstruction. Collusion okay, not obstruction. The fact that obstruction is still part of the interview appears to be setting the president off. He tweeted, this is a terrible situation and attorney Jeff Sessions should stop this rigged witch hunt right now before it stnz to stain our coun
A look at the days latest news and headlines. About his luggage caused alarm among hotel employees, and while he had complained to friends about feeling constantly in pain or fatigued and has doctor described him as odd and possibly bipolar, nothing about his behavior raised any red flags. By all accounts, Stephen Paddock was an unremarkable man mans movements leading up to october 1st didnt raise any suspicion. In an interview with his doctor indicated signs of a troubled mind, but no troubling behavior that would trigger a call to Law Enforcement. Paddock was a highstakes gambler whose bank balance had dropped from 2 million in 2015 to half a Million Dollars by september 2017. He paid 600,000 to casinos, 170,000 to credit card companies, and had spent 95,000 on weapons and ammunition. Harris lisa, as we try to get answers, im taking notes on what you ares income too, because legal expert arent finished yet, either. Im about to interview one of them. Its legal to know what some of you
A recap of the days headlines and a look at whats in store for tomorrow. Terminate the program. Theyre saying, you didnt give us a sufficient reason. In the meantime, let me read a little bit of the judges decision. The courts simply hold that if they wish to take any other action, it must give a rational explanation for its decision. That a prior policy is illegal simply wont do it. Ken, is this their fault for not getting this right . I think this is going to be the travel ban 2. 0. It means we cant get kavanaugh on the Supreme Court soon enough. He needs to be confirmed as the new justice because this case may end up there eventually. The reality is there are three legal problems with daca. Theres a federal law with how agencies make policies to implement stac statutes. Its the Administration Procedure act. When both daca and dapa were
and that was their rational explanation. They werent very big fans of the reasoning in what they received. Our Buddy Buck Sexton tweeted, why do we e
Enter the a team. Private eyes. There had been a brief encounter with a mysterious stranger. On the train coming home. She met this woman. Did that hold the answer . She is talking about how someone has tried to assume her identity. A chilling case of a daughter in danger. Strangers on a train. Hello and welcome to date line extra. She was beautiful. Talented and trusting and sometimes troubled. A young woman from a prem innoce prominent family. When the police were unable to find her. Her family hatched a plan. To solve the mystery. Heres keith morris son. It began in the great morning
A young woman disappears, and a chance encounter with a stranger on a train may hold some answers. Visa. A Paperwork Mixup sort of thing that would have sent her into a tailspin once, but now, the new kate vowed to try again later. Boarded the palmetto for charleston and once home threw herself into College Classes and a Childrens Book shed been writing. Big brother joe was, to say the least, encouraged
Chris Cuomo asks the tough questions to newsmakers in Washington and around the world. But they won, and if you look at why the women won, almost to a person they were much closer to the center and the Traditional Democratic views than what were seeing with the new crops, you included. Do you think that is a reflection about how much change your party can take and how soon, that more of those candidates are winning because theyre huing more closely to Traditional Democratic standards . Well, i think you have to take a look at two things. Where the American People are at and then also what wins campaigns. And its no secret that while Grassroots Campaigns absolutely are have their place and are very strong in Voter Turnout when they are able to turn out voters. Money does win elections. So when you have pac groups that are able to pour in half a million to a Million Dollars per race, that absolutely makes an impact. However, nothing changes the fact that the majority of americans believe