20 Justice Sotomayor host they said it was not final. There is no final determination or listing and we are going to take comment on that as part of the rulemaking to examine the admission standards. The Agency Addresses related to in light of this study address whether such regulation under the section is appropriate and necessary for power plants. It may be necessary to regulate Something Like mercury. That may not be the appropriate Regulatory Regime if their view of the statute is not to focus on whether such regulation is appropriate, whether listing of power plants is under subsection c is appropriate just like every other source. Justice scalia can i ask whether that listing are subject to the categorization device that Justice Breyer was asking about . Could the agency say were going to divide these categories since 80 of plants dont have waterfalls nearby, were going to exempt them from these minimum standards . Mr. Brownell no, your honor not at a listing stage. Justice kagan
What you think. Our phone lines are open. Host you can catch up with us on all your favorite social media pages. Host a very good Tuesday Morning to you. That hobby lobby case is the subject of many articles and editorials and Opinion Pieces in todays papers. Go through a few of them for you this morning. Here is the wall street journal. Contraceptive case skews ideological lines. The lead editorial in the dont openn, pandoras box. Discrimination is likely to extend far beyond simple access to contraception. And usa today, hobby lobby case fuels bigotry. We want to start by reading a bit from an opinion piece from over the weekend on this case from pastor rick warren. His piece appeared in the Washington Post. Does our constitution guarantee the freedom of religion or does it merely allow a more limited freedom to worship . The freedom tove place our beliefs and ethics at the center of our Business Practices or must we ignore them when we form a company . Hobbytcome of sebelius v lobby
Cspan2. And live today at 4 p. M. Eastern here on cspan2, chilean president michelle [inaudible] will be at the brookings institution. Shes meeting with president obama this morning. You had broadcast tv and then cable came along, and then satellite. What if satellite had said, you know, were different than cable. We have a slightly Different Technology, so were going to take that and not consider ourselves to be what is in law called an nvpd. So we dont have to negotiate. But satellite didnt do that, and so why should aereo be able to come up with a Different Technology and say we dont have to negotiate for copyrighted material . Weve said from the beginning this isnt about being a opposed to technology. Theres still a technology there in aereo, and maybe theres a Business Model for it. But that doesnt mean you can evade the law to run a business. More about the Supreme Court decision against aereo with the head of the National Association of broadcasters, gordon smith. Tonight at 8 e
Approximately 100 billion. More than the United States has ever spent to rebuild a country. I further quote. Since then congress has appropriated another 16. 5 billion for reconstruction, and all that has not brought the United States or the afghans a single Sustainable Institution or program. As i travel through the third traveled through the Third District of North Carolina last week, i spoke on this subject many times and was met with frustration from the audience at the waste of taxpayers money in afghanistan. When i went on to explain that the Afghan Parliament was able to vote on the bilateral strategic agreement that we are in the process of finalizing with afghanistan, but we have not even debated the issue in the house, the individuals with whom i spoke were incredibly disappointed in congress. Mr. Speaker, we cannot blame the American People for wanting a vote on this agreement, which will spend billions of american dollars in afghanistan with little to no accountability over
To know those products work to help smokers stop smoking. They are actually not approved for reduction. They are only approved for abrupt cessation. But there is a robust Evidence Base that when marketed to help smokers quit and when used properly, people can succeed. By contrast, to go to the questions from senator alexander about what you know and what you dont know when it comes to e cigarettes there is a whole lot to know. I agree with you totally. Can you point to any new innovation where we know right at the beginning everything about it and that we could come to an assessment. Im hopeful through your studies you find this product as safe. We dont want an unsafe product out there that contributes to a different problem. Ut if you find that its safe, are we going to say the same thing about ecigarettes 10 years from now. Gee, the body of evidence did a tremendous thing. Isnt that a good thing . If we are going to regulate them as Tobacco Products, we have to find that the claims,