Latest Breaking News On - Donald coffman - Page 2 : comparemela.com

The Tennessee Supreme Court s opinion in Carolyn Coffman et al v. Armstrong International, Inc., et al., at least implicitly, recognized a bare metal defense for the first time under Tennessee law. The Court addressed the issue of whether, under Tennessee law, equipment defendants had a duty to warn of the dangers associated with the post-sale integration of asbestos-containing materials manufactured and sold by others. The Court held that, under the Tennessee Products Liability Act (TPLA), Tenn. Code Ann. §29-28-101 through 108, the equipment defendants did not have a duty to warn end users about the post-sale incorporation of asbestos containing products

United statesDonald coffmanCarolyn coffmanTennessee courtSupreme courtArmstrong international incTennessee supreme courtSupreme court rulingTennessee products liability actTennessee eastmanEquipment defendantsTennessee supreme court implicitly adopts the quot bare metal defenseEdiation amp arbitrationTrials amp appeals compensationஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்டொனால்ட் காஃப்மேன்