officials. here s the true scandal. they still work there. for attorney general merrick garland. today. right now. this is where we start today. former acting u.s. solicitor and professor neil katatel is here. and mike schmidt is here. a reporter that broke this big story last night for the new york times. all three msnbc contributors. mike schmidt, take us through what you describe as a sense that the justice department that might have been at least partially politically motivated on barr s part. whatever the underlying evidence was in this investigation back in 2017, 2018, that got the justice department to this point, whatever it was, we don t have full visibility into the investigation, what the justice department did was exactly what
Intel Drop: Nuclear Terrorism, Impossible Without Control of the Narrative, History, News and Reality – Veterans Today | Military Foreign Affairs Policy Journal for Clandestine Services
veteranstoday.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from veteranstoday.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
MSNBC The Beat With Ari Melber February 17, 2020 23:40:30
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the ag personally does the digging. go on. i was going to say, i completely agree with that. it s a decoy. focusing on barr and looking at the 2016 election is sort of the decoy. the democrats and people concerned need to make it clear. the focus of this issue is the president. the president asking a foreign leader to intervene in our election. the president does not get a pass on doing that just because he simply alleges that he thinks his opponent might be corrupt. you don t get a pass in that. that s a violation of the constitutional oath. when you condition the actions which the president seems to do on a foreign government s interfering during the investigation, you re probably invoking five or six major criminal statutes. you don t need a criminal statute for impeachment, a violation of your constitutional
and that s exactly what he s doing. adam schiff, thank you so much for joining us. thank you. let s continue the analysis of what we heard, very forceful shall has a game plan, road map, working and the speaker has given him the authority to go ahead and push. right. what he did say to you is that he s very worried about getting some of these people to testify because the president, as he said, has been threatening these witnesses. we heard what the president said today. it s clear there s going to be some blood letting somewhere, whether it s in the white house or somewhere in the national security realm. but, you know, when you have a president out there, calling these people treasonous, he said look, you know, this is going to be very difficult for us. he was also quite tough on barr, the attorney general, who put out a statement, saying he knew nothing about any of this. but the president of the united states seemed to feel fine