doctor overprescribing prescription medication, you are not going to be able to prove that that person is directly responsible for multiple deaths. i don t think that s going to fly. i do think he is speaking in terms of the multistep approach, stopping at the border, having the doj go after harsher sentencing, it s going to be a difficult thing. harris: i just had a flashback to the cartel members crossing the border, some of them were rather infamous and had to be sent back or brought here back and forth between here and our southern border. sandra: you talk about the president coming at that with toughness, i think there s something else there and he s been very open about the struggles of his brother and losing his brother to alcoholism, this is a president who says he does not drink, does not smoke, has never done drugs. it was something else, you get a sense that he really cares about making this change for this country.
is based. but we do know, according to jeff sessions, that it was based on an inspector general review, and it was firing that was recommended by the office of professional responsibility, who is also staffed by career professionals, not trump appointees. you re right, ana, and the opr and fbi and the inspection division, these are career people. these are people who don t care about politics. my concern is, at what point did the doj go to the fbi and say, we need you to weigh in on this? was it something they said, we need you to hurry up and get this done by a set date in time. if that s the case, i think it s highly inappropriate. i worked in the fbi for over a decade, and i never recall seeing a case that had a deadline attached to it where you have to do this before x date. if that s what s happened here, there are a lot of questions that need to be answered. mark, if you were on the president s legal team, building a case to attack the cred blth of the special counsel s cas
ned, i m sorry about that. we know who he is and see what he looks like. now i guess the allegation is that huma lied under oath to the f.b.i. and mishandled classified information and even disseminated classified information to her sex offender ex-husband. are we going to have to lock her up now with her ex-husband? hasn t she been through enough? not at all in my opinion. i don t know what you want to go through. let me be clear with you. i m not concerned about her being charged with perjury. whatever her inconsistent statement was it had no material effect on the outcome of the investigation. nor will the f.b.i. go back or d.o.j. go back and take a look at that. what emails did she say she backed up? the same emails from the state department. they shut down the investigation? why? no material difference or impact. whether you agree with that or not that s what the law is. politically it may sound crazy
ned, i m sorry about that. we know who he is and see what he looks like. now i guess the allegation is that huma lied under oath to the f.b.i. and mishandled classified information and even disseminated classified information to her sex offender ex-husband. are we going to have to lock her up now with her ex-husband? hasn t she been through enough? not at all in my opinion. i don t know what you want to go through. let me be clear with you. i m not concerned about her being charged with perjury. whatever her inconsistent statement was it had no material effect on the outcome of the investigation. nor will the f.b.i. go back or d.o.j. go back and take a look at that. what emails did she say she backed up? the same emails from the state department. they shut down the investigation? why? no material difference or impact. whether you agree with that or not that s what the law is. politically it may sound crazy
there you have the president of the united states saying to the doj go ahead, do you got to do. we threw the first logical questionnaires from trump is honestly not going to have him release information that would be in any way temperamental to him or anyone else. he must know something and read it where y elsewhere who would he do that? it is a make sense especially with all those other stuff going on from a practical perspective. kennedy: under eric holder and the writer lynch into signing the mba and then being threatened if if you came forwd as a whistleblower and talk to congress or any other investigatory body. was very interesting here, even if you take the clintons out of it because there s a long shady stuff that doesn t make sense. hillary calls a bologna, but none of it adds up. to your question, why did we do this? of his criminal informant has gleaned some truth as to why these agencies rushed this along, it goes much deeper than the clintons and then we are talking abou