they only help those who have an income. so the things they re proposing don t do the things the affordable care act does. lars, let me pose that same question to you. is there a risk in the gop proposing alternatives in the sense a lot of conservative, libertarians don t want the government involved in our health care in any way, shape, or form? i don t want the government involved. every time government gets involved they screw it up and obamacare is a prime example. alan seems to think it would take 50 state law changes around america. doesn t the federal government control interstate commerce? couldn t the federal government say if i can buy car insurance or home inshurn or fire insurance across state lines why can t i buy health insurance across state lines? that would be one simple solution, but it s not the whole solution. but having the government dictate a 60-year-old woman has to have a health insurance plan that includes maternity as one of the ten different mandates bro
than looking for this airplane. we should still look for it clearly. as far as the simulator goes throw, is there promise from your perspective that the deleted data can be retrieved? absolutely. remember oliver north deleted everything in the security council. we got it all back. they re very good at that. these people are outstanding. it takes a while, but they ll get it back. we can see maybe if he was planning way point changes in a flight plan or something. i don t know what s in there, but it s going to give us it potentially could give you the answer to the case. what s interesting, the malaysian authorities are saying they believe that the plane was deliberately turned back. terrorism of course can t be ruledith the release of the final 5 4 minutes of the flight deck, the malaysian government is saying they found nothing suspicious in those conversations. what do you make of that? i would like to listen to it
multiple times against, and it s a broadly worded statute about misusing government power. and that s probably the statute that most directly applies here. the question is who is going to prosecute the case. if the u.s. attorney paul fishman doesn t bring criminal charges because he has a hard time finding a federal statute, what he would like to do is refer to it to new jersey attorney general s office. as it happens doesn t the federal government regulate interstate commerce? yes. it can. that s what patrick foye originally suggested, the bridge act. people who looked at the statute says it talks about extortion and other things that may not apply in this case. remember, we don t know all the facts. so you get to the state law. so you get to the state law. the attorney general is in new jersey is appointed by the governor. he reports directly to the governor. it s not an elected position like it is in most other states. right now there isn t even a there is only an acting
carolina. if you get the right voters out, you can save that state. also, if you get out chapel hill vote too. right. but you got to get about 100% turnout in chapel hill. you got to get every vote you can. now, they have jim messina and other people out there who know how to do this. we saw is the last time around with republicans in 2012 were completely hapless. let s look at the good news for the democrats. let s look at the issues that the president thinks. these are interesting. the latest are facing a challenge in landscape of course in november. but when it comes to almost every major issue, the majority of americans actually do, this is so ironic, given sort of the bad morale out there for the dems. nearly two-thirds want the minimum wage raised to $10.10. two-thirds of the country. on the affordable care act, the majority of americans do say they don t want to get rid of it. they don t want to repeal it. they would rather fix it. this is not republican orthodoxy here
that s bridget kelly we re looking at there. an official corruption statute that has been used multiple times against, and it s a broadly worded statute about misusing government power. and that s probably the statute that most directly applies here. the question is who is going to prosecute the case. if the u.s. attorney paul fishman doesn t bring criminal charges because he has a hard time finding a federal statute, what he would like to do is refer to it to new jersey attorney general s office. as it happens doesn t the federal government regulate interstate commerce? yes. it can. that s what patrick foye originally suggested, the bridge act. people who looked at the statute says it talks about extortion and other things that may not apply in this case. remember, we don t know all the facts. so you get to the state law. so you get to the state law. the attorney general is in new jersey is appointed by the governor. he reports directly to the governor. it s not an elect