scab but you brought it up. that is exactly the way you re supposed to handle an investigation of this sensitivity. when you compare it to the clinton case, everyone talks about the situation comey was in where if they had. the anthony weiner laptop and they had to look at it, then he had to go notify congress. the important comparison is they didn t have to look before the election. they could have made the same decision they made with the trump investigation which is to delay flew overt investigative steps because there was no reason to. evidence is going to be destroyed, witnesses are going to flee, none of that was at stake. you can make that prudential decision. you can say look, it s important that we don t taint an american election with our activities and so we ll push something off. the key detail though is this idea that an informant that a government informant talked to two people on the campaign, george papadopoulos and carter page. yeah, the stuff on papadopoulos and p
they have been unable to resist their sweet tooth for sugar subsidies. helping farmers to adjustable droughts, sugar subsidies are what americans pay for sugar. virginia fox of north carolina hopes for amendment to the farm bill will reform sugar subsidies once and for all. this is a soviet style program and it doesn t comport with what americans believe in. reporter: this would modernize sugar subsidies by removing limits to the mystic production and implement another market reforms. every few years when it comes up for refill renewal, it inches closer to passage. this week it is closer than ever. last time we voted on the farm bill, only 7 votes it failed. the trouble is the farm bill is almost unanimously opposed by
like other price supports that help farmers to the dust bowl droughts sugar subsidies artificially virginia foxx hopes the amendment will reform sugar subsidies. as my colleague has said, this is a soviet style program. it just doesn t comport with white americans believe in. her amendment would modernize sugar subsidies by remove it limits to subsidies. every five years when the farm bill comes up for renewal, reforming subsidies inches closer to passage. this week, it s closer than ever. the last time we voted on the farmville, it failed by basically only seven votes. the trouble is that the farmville is a most unanimously opposed by democrats not because of the amendment will because republicans have include work requirement for snap.
learn of this? did you know you were paying him back for this money that was paid to stormy daniels? rudy giuliani seemed to start answering those questions this week and clearly now we re learning in a way that donald trump doesn t think works for him or doesn t comport with what he believes his version of the facts are. that s why as you re saying this statement we re going to get from giuliani, because he has spoken so much and at length over the last 48 hours, with so many new fact patterns in there, it is hard to imagine that one single statement is going to be able to both keep the president s language on air force one as still operable which the president believe it is and square that with anything that giuliani said over the last two days. he s going to force us to believe go ahead, michael, he s going to force us to believe somehow the president was michael cohen and didn t know why he was paying him and we need to know when he started paying him and when he did know why h
complete ban on muslims entering the country. a muslim ban. donald j. trump is calling for a total and complete shut down of muslims entering the united states. i thought that was awful. i don t know how anyone could stand up and say that that s where we as a country ought to go, or that that is consistent with our constitution and our values. and so i that week actually i went to a moscow and gave a talk there, talking about similarities of mormons and muslims if you will or the persecution there s been in the past, and expressing some solidarity with knows under attack here. and, one, i think it s it certainly doesn t comport with our values. but it doesn t comport with our security needs either. it s just not smart to have a ban like this. do you think it was still motivated by the same impulses.