seem to have really noxious views about people who are different than they are, folks who seem to be insensitive to other people who are suffering. it just brings up the question of character. who are these people and are they a reflection, actually, of the president himself? erick, is it top down here? it s interesting. i ve talked to people inside and around the white house because i wrote the other day maybe it is time for john kelly to go, but if so, a lot of other people, as well. they re like, please don t. he s the guy keeping the trains running around here. isn t that how rob porter ended up there because it goes to peggy s point. it goes to peggy s point. there is a side issue here of why was rob porter allowed to have such a senate career? with republicans. what is going on in the house and senate related? i get what marc short was saying, that we looked at this guy, this doesn t comport to what we knew of him. i feel the same way about john kelly probably did that. i
these allude to some kind of possible knowledge that president obama had or maybe some hand he had in his investigation, i don t want to take a too far because perhaps he just wanted to know what was going on in the trump russia investigation, after the hillary investigation was closed. the emphatic nature of president obama when he spoke to chris wallace in an interview saying i never inquire about anything the fbi is doing and here you have a firsthand account, something we think is private from a senior fbi official saying the president of the united states wants to know everything we know. that doesn t comport with what the president said publicly and it begs the question what were they talking about? maybe nothing to do with the hillary clinton email but maybe it did and maybe it had to do
the story to a magazine or book publisher doesn t comport with reality. but it really does seem to be seeping in the mainstream. this was rush limbaugh this week. listen to this. what if the quote/unquote, intelligence community misrepresented on purpose the degree to which hussein had wmds because, i ll tell you, it was a very, very embarrassing moment. so if i get this right, the conspiracy now, it s not just to up-end president trump but it goes all the way back to wmds. rush limbaugh has a lot of pull. influence over a lot of conservative who is are both elected or activists. the reality is, intelligence folks do get it wrong sometimes and they did get it wrong with weapons of mass destruction in iraq. the interesting thing that people don t pay much attention to is every other service in the world got it wrong, as well.
i mean, the idea you could have some kind of a cabal to organize or control the government in some way and have it not leak or somebody go sell the story to a magazine or to a book publisher doesn t comport with reality. this idea after secret society targeting the president, that may seem far-fetched. but what about this idea there is this bias inside the fbi? right. i think we can have fun with the notion they re having decoder rings and special titles and nicknames, but then take a look at the larger picture, bias within the fbi. since when is the fbi some sort of a left-wing organization, number one? number two, if they were trying to get hillary clinton elected president, they did a really poor job of doing that with comey coming out and basically tanking her a week before the
kabal to organize or control the government in some way and have it not leak or somebody go sell the story to a magazine or book publisher doesn t comport with reality. but it really does seem to be seeping in the mainstream. this was rush limbaugh this week. listen to this. what if the quote/unquote, intelligence community misrepresented on purpose the degree to which hussein had wmds because, i ll tell you, it was a very, very embarrassing moment. so if i get this right, the conspiracy now, it s not just to up-end president trump but it goes all the way back to wmds. rush limbaugh has a lot of pull. influence over a lot of conservative who is are both elected or activists. the reality is, intelligence folks do get it wrong sometimes and they did get it wrong with weapons of mass destruction in iraq.