wedding websites for same sex couples. an application of the first amendment to civil rights law that could affect public accommodations perhaps even gay marriage access for many minority groups. good day. i m andrea mitchell in washington where the supreme court just ended its urm with a conservative super majority flexing its muscle once again. this morning striking down the student loan forgiveness program with the chief justice writing in part the secretary of education asserts the heroes act. in a second major ruling today but perhaps even more far ranging consequences down the road the six conservatives, gorsuch writing the opinion saying the first amendment rights of a colorado website designer give her the freedom to refuse from accepting same sex couples from her business. in this case justice sotomayor read aloud a strongly worded dissent from the bench to emphasize her strong disagreement. writing in part, lgbt people have existed for all of human history. and as s
but at what price? he made a whole lot of concessions and it darn near came to blows. more on that later. just how did things unfold the way they did on that crucial 15th ballot, and how did mccarthy forces get those 6 never kevin members to end up voting present rather than against mccarthy? pennsylvania republican scott perry was a no vote on mccarthy too, but with he changed his mind a few voting rounds earlier. why then? we ll ask him, because perry is here now. and so is texas congressman keith selt who did the same thing. and look who wells is joining us this morning who else, none other than dan crenshaw who had some very choice words for those early holdouts, called them enemies, and that was even the nice part. what does he think no? and why dud south dakota republican dusty johnson insist republicans can move on now? he ll tell us. they ll all tell us because they re all here, and so are we. ed good morning, everybody, i m neil cavuto, and maybe i should be saying
you know, he plays the tv game and he went too far here. that really didn t help, talking about that primarying liz. he created a sense of revenge. graham saying trump went too far. really? and created a sense of revenge. he s saying trump has responsibility for those terrorists that attacked and tried to overthrow the country as the january 6th committee preps public hearings with videotape testimony. today new emails from trump lawyer john eastman, the mastermind of the coup. he circulated that memo, a sort of coup playbook. he urged gop lawmakers in pennsylvania to, quote, retabulate the state s popular vote and throw out tens of thousands of absentee ballots. eastman writing the strategy would, quote, help provide some cover for republicans who would place joe biden s electors with a slate of trump electors. senator mike lee texted trump s chief of staff mark meadows on november 23rd. quote, john eastman has some really interesting research on this. the good news is tha
infrastructure to do it, never mind for a pandemic. infrastructure to do it, never mind fora pandemic. so, first infrastructure to do it, never mind for a pandemic. so, first of all, there wasn t the capability. second, we were told, even if we had the capability it would only delay things by a relatively trivial amount and third, of course, people at that time, the reaction from a lot of people was closing the borders is ray cysts, you wren when the supermodel cap price said why aren t we closing the border, a lot of people mocked her as if she was an idiot. that was the prevailing wisdom from the public health system and was reflected, the dismissal of caprice i would say was reflected in number ten by the public health system. of course if you are going for a single, for a single wave herd immunity by september fundingal strategy, then, faffing round at the borders wasn t regarded as relevant or coherent with such a strategy. bi; or coherent with such a strategy. by that d
do this legislatively. yeah, it s important for folks to know this decision doesn t strike down the president s ability to do this in general. it strikes down the way he was doing it. and so there are other ways that, you know, that an administration can go about ensuring that he can forgive student loan debt. it is completely constitutional and within his authority. now it s going to be incumbent upon the administration to find other ways to do it and other laws to look at and other mechanisms. i have confidence he ll do it. i m hearing we ll hear from the white house soon i and it s important we don t give up on this fight. as you said it s not just about about young people. yes, it s about a whole generation of people who have crushing student loan debt, but older folks have crushing student loan debt as well. to my colleagues and opportunities who agree with