where he ll finally experience consequences for some of his actions. next week, tuesday, marks the beginning of the second e. jean carroll defamation trial. news on that later on. but first things first, developments ahead of closing arguments. tomorrow in new york s $250 million civil fraud lawsuit. the judge revealed he would not allow donald trump to deliver part of those closing arguments himself as he had requested. the reasoning, neither trump nor his attorneys ever got back to the judge agreeing to preconditions. in truth, it is hard to imagine what trump wanted more, an opportunity to put himself at the center of proceedings to deliver his message in his own way, or an opportunity like this, to complain, whine about being silenced, despite the fact his own team failed to respond to the judge on time. remember, in both cases, e. jean carroll s defamation and new york s civil fraud, trump s guilt has already been determined. these decisions will only settle the punish.
covid s that ended up being true. watch this. there were things obviously. , maybe factual but may not be harmful. are you going to censor someone for being harm if there s no harm the occasion of what they re doing? but there are other places where they take the stuff around covid earlier in the pandemic, real health implications but that hasn t been time to vet the scientific assumptions. a lot of the establishment, waffled on a bunch of facts and asked for things to be censored, more debatable or true. convenient is the word i have for that. it s kind of convenient to say that now when a majority of americans are over covid moving past it. before i go to one of you, this is mark zuckerberg talking about the 18 million post they did remove. if we see harmful misinformation on the platform and we take down, it s against our policy. when you see this, what you think? it reminds me of the hunter biden laptop story where only 18 months after the fact that all these ne
indictment. no one has made that allegation. at the end of the day, you have to weigh the damage of the indictment versus the damage of the allegations. it s just not even a fair way. senator marco rubio s evolution on donald trump s access to and handling of classified documents. yeah, i agree, it s not even a close call. you weigh whether you believe as the 11th circuit said that the foundational principle of this country, that no man is above the law, and you balance that against whatever marco was saying we should balance it against. and, you know, willie, i just you will notice you will notice of all of the noise out there, of all of the ground noise, nobody is saying he s innocent. nobody is saying he did not commit the crimes that will put him in jail for over a hundred years, if convicted on all things. i can t think of one person who has said this man did not do it. so what they say is what about hillary? i mean but they had a long time to do that.
covid s that ended up being true. watch this. there were things obviously. , maybe factual but may not be harmful. are you going to censor someone for being harm if there s no harm the occasion of what they re doing? but there are other places where they take the stuff around covid earlier in the pandemic, real health implications but that hasn t been time to vet the scientific assumptions. a lot of the establishment, waffled on a bunch of facts and asked for things to be censored, more debatable or true. convenient is the word i have for that. it s kind of convenient to say that now when a majority of americans are over covid moving past it. before i go to one of you, this is mark zuckerberg talking about the 18 million post they did remove. if we see harmful misinformation on the platform and we take down, it s against our policy. when you see this, what you think? it reminds me of the hunter biden laptop story where only 18 months after the fact that all these ne
covid s that ended up being true. watch this. there were things obviously. , maybe factual but may not be harmful. are you going to censor someone for being harm if there s no harm the occasion of what they re doing? but there are other places where they take the stuff around covid earlier in the pandemic, real health implications but that hasn t been time to vet the scientific assumptions. a lot of the establishment, waffled on a bunch of facts and asked for things to be censored, more debatable or true. convenient is the word i have for that. it s kind of convenient to say that now when a majority of americans are over covid moving past it. before i go to one of you, this is mark zuckerberg talking about the 18 million post they did remove. if we see harmful misinformation on the platform and we take down, it s against our policy. when you see this, what you think? it reminds me of the hunter biden laptop story where only 18 months after the fact that all these ne