You have national tribunals, you have an International Criminal court, why create another tribunal . The problem is that we are faced with a lack of accountability because there is no International Court that can prosecute putin, the senior Political Leadership and the senior military command of russia. State for the crime of aggression, even the icc does not have such jurisdiction, unfortunately, but everyone these crimes that we are currently documenting are the result of crime, aggression or the result of their leaderships decision to plan and wage this war, if we want to prevent something worse in the future, we must punish the state and its leaders that start such wars today, precisely therefore , we must sense this gap in capabilities and. Create a special tribunal on aggression and bring putin, lukashenka and their entourage to justice. Is there progress on this matter . I know that there were discussions, it seems that they were western countries say yes, in principle, but in p
Negotiating table and find a solution in which ukraine will be recognized as a sovereign and independent state. Nato secretary general Jen Stoltenberg said this during a joint press conference with the Prime Minister of sweden, in the same brussels. At the same time, he added that putin started this war and he can end it today, but ukraine does not have such an opportunity. Capitulation is not peace says mr. Stoltenberg, therefore the alliance is continuing. To help us to our complete victory, and for this, again, says the nato secretary general, he welcomes the supply of longrange missiles to ukraine, and he refused to talk about specific systems and specific allies who can provide it. Well, if Jen Stoltenberg was in favor, did not condemn, but was surprised by the statement of pope francis, then it is obvious that in russia she was applauded. Those standing in the kremlin were happy to pick it up, although in the end i and each of you had no doubts about this. Putins spokesman Dmitry
Were informed about the suspicion, informs the specialized anticorruption Prosecutors Office. Oleksandr lysenko and oleksandr zhurba, let me remind you, were caught extorting uah 2,130 a bribe, the sum was asked for unimpeded business in the city. Officials were caught redhanded while receiving the last tranche of bribes in the amount of uah 1,400. The Security Service and the National Anticorruption bureau of ukraine reported that the officials imposed a tribute on the local garbage removal company, and now the question of choosing a preventive measure for the officials is being decided. Well, it became known about three more wounded in antonivka in the kherson region, two women and a man were treated on the spot, a total of seven injured a 69yearold man died, he was in the garage during an enemy airstrike, the head of the region Oleksandr Prokudin said, apparently a Russian Missile attack is being prepared. The occupiers took two small missile ships of the buyanm project to the black
, what concerns mobilization, because we still have well, sovkova, im sorry, the system is called the tcc, but in fact the same military commissars are still subordinate to the Ground Forces of ukraine, the commanders of their home Ground Forces. What should the ministry of defense as an administrative body do on the front line . For our army. He should take these issues upon himself, including well, as i said about policy information. It seems to me that here we need to give more opportunities to our general staff to inform about the real situation at the front or to representatives of certain operational commands there. Ah, no. The ministry of defense , the ministry of defense, it can only provide information about , for example, the types of weapons that are supplied because it is their parish, about, for example, some important innovations regarding procurement, about all this. So it can inform the ministry of defense because it is within their authorized functions, but regarding t