Conditioned on various things in state cooperation in state enactment and regulations on federal requirements. In the finance committee, the origin of the aca 2002 with the tax credit offered and put in place in that year. The statutory provisions identified in the chairmans mark of the aca as the statutory precursor language that would be modified and build upon in enacting the statute. In fact, the structure of using coverage month as a basis for the part of how you define eligibility wasnt not found in a prior statutory language, a contracted the same committee. Experts propose doing it here. People that know a lot about health care. One example, professor tim jones, one of the most Prominent Health care professors in the country, significant enough to be invited to the white house when the statue was signed off authored a paper saying if were going to do a Seed Exchange model, we can come up with various ways of encouraging states to cooperate. One of the things we can do is we can
Welcome, everyone. Tonight the committee for the e republ republic hosi republic host ing a hosting a debate on the war and it could not be better timing. Here below we have john yoo on the left. John was Deputy Assistant attorney general for the office of Legal Council in the bush Justice Department. John wrote a number of key legal memos supporting bushs post911 Counter Terrorism policies. And bruce was associate Deputy Attorney general under president reagan and also was chief policy advisor to rand paul during the 2012 president ial campaign. And harvey stand up. He is going to be our moderator. He is currently dean of the national war college. Harveys last government job worked for the director of national intelligence. Thank you. [applause] there wasnt a single founder who doubted that going to war was the most important decision the republic could make. The war powers is the most important power was war threatens the republic. Since the executive has more incentive to go to war
Host of the National War College. The last government job you worked for the director of national intelligence. Thank you [applause] there wasnt a single founder who doubted that going to war was the most important decision the republic could make. War is the greatest threat to the public. War focuses power on the executive saying since the executive has more incentive to go to war the founders placed the power of going to war the congress not the executive. The founder who understood war better than any president was George Washington who gave a long farewell address and spelled out the Foreign Policy of the foreigners. He said we should stay neutral in war and cut all foreign powers because they will entangle us in their wars. To support neutrality washington said be leerly and not to borrow more money than we can pay off and avoid political factions. Sounds good me. I am sticking with george. Harvey is the moderator. Bruce you will go first and then john and harvey is going to ask q
So the next generation with this institution will go on. Last june we had a thousand students attend a fourday seminar offering 120 courses. They came from 80 countries with 60 teachers, mentors. And next year, we will have more than that because they recommend others. One of our Facebook Pages, poverty cure, has about 1. 5 million lakes on it. And why is this . This is because im the oldest person on our staff. They are pushing this forward. They understand the social media. We are not the whole thing here we are part of it. We try to bring the conversation together and enable other groups like the Steamboat Institute and other very good groups should do more is what we are doing to the foundations of the American Republic in things like that. So we are doing it. But our website act in. Org and see the scholarship in materials and curriculum or you can use in your churches then your study groups and organizations and i pray god when you go there, you will see its topquality staff. It
The leadup to the filing of the action including prior litigation in the 2011 reauthorization of the Voting Rights act. He will also discuss recent change in several states texas, North Carolina, ohio, wisconsin and how and whether preclearance would have affected implementation of these laws. After he speaks, dan will provide more about the process. The context with the case including Voting Rights act preclearance was and wasnt doing, he will also discuss what has happened since 2013 including new tate laws and practices and litigation challenges that under the constitution in section 2 of the Voting Rights act. With that ill hand it over to brendan. Thanks, chad for, for inviting me to participate in the panel. I want to start by saying im here to give my perspective as someone who participated in the actual litigation of the case and to provide that unique perspective for you all to hear. Basically the backdrop of all of this is here in the United States we have dual regulation of