as you were watching. no question. we are going to see this split screen applicable to the entire next year for sure. next session of this congress. let s go between what s happening on capitol hill and the presidential campaign. as julie was saying, that s going to show democrats if they come to liberal or divicive, how will that bleed over? similar to what we saw 12 years ago in 2007. i was thinking back watching the old pictures of speaker pelosi then as we see more senators coming to the floor. another new senator, also a former house member, kevin kramer, another republican who toppled an incumbent democrat. we are talking about north carolina. another interesting, familiar senator there, ted cruz who won against beto o rourke.
while big insurance companies deny patients-saving coverage and big banks rip off consumers and while big oil companies destroy this planet, the whole scam is propped up by an ecochamber of fear and hate designed to distract and divide us. i m going to watch this from his last campaign. it s a big question. there are legitimate policy differences. i think everybody gets pegged into the progressive how left can they go. you hear a lot of the low hanging fruit issues. the policy which warren has a good track record on in terms of depth, will that matter? it will matter a lot to democrats. she is unloading red meat for democrats. these are the issues they want to hear about and that they are interested in. at the same time warren is a lightning rod and a divicive figure and trump will pounce on
important voice nationally, she is a divicive figure. a unifying voice is what we need after donald trump. warren missed her moment in 2016. there is a reason to be skeptical of her candidacy. that s the hometown newspaper who wanted her to run in 2020. is there something there? the idea that she may run? that s always the question that people will be asking as well. if joe biden decides to throw his hat into the ring as well. this is a crowded field and the fact is that people know elizabeth warren. she has the highest name recognition of the field and the early polls suggest that really what the need and the interest in democratic party is for fresh voices and new faces and younger people who capture this new movement in the party that we saw through the elections to the house in 2018. i want to bring up the usa today poll on 2020 contenders with democrats and independents.
the same messages. i m very eager to see what tweet he puts out, considering how much leverage he s gotten from elizabeth warren. cory said about how one of trump s political skills is creating a foil. the media is one of those, but also elizabeth warren is another one of those who has obviously become a divicive figure. one of the interesting things is where democrats meet with him and he goes on the elizabeth warren rant for a reason none of them can figure out. i want to get to one, what rachel is talking about. warren had folks in the early primary seats for months. that was me that was made clear. to go back to the boston globe editorial, while warren is an
writing warren missed her moment in 2016 and there is reason to be skeptical of her perspective candidacy in 2020. while warren is an impactful senator, she is a divicive figure, a unifying voice is what the country needs after the polarizing politics of donald trump. in 2015 the globe urged warren to take a presidential run. she decided to release a video do you meaning her decision to take a dna test to prove her ancestry. it resulted in mockery is the right and criticism from liberals. it matters. they encouraged her to get involved in the last presidential election. it makes a difference to have this change of heard. he was in a bind with the dna test. if you don t do it, you are john