tucker: why not stand up? standing up there is a difference between you expressing a view and the new providing intimidation and harassment to another student. tucker: if you are going to ban whiteboards, why stop there? why not ban pens and keyboards and other instruments of diversion opinion and just sort of suppressed speech and everyone would be happy? you are pretty articulate with a command so my precise command of the language. presumably an article this long, you could explain what action, what form that we take pride in this case, you say it takes flipping cars over. someone paid for those cars. those aren t your cars. to destroy someone else s property to make your political point isn t really a valid path, as it? first of all, they flipped cars second of all, tucker, i think it s an article. i exaggerated. i am trying to explain what i think i actually mean by political action that doesn t consist of sanitized or moderated q and a sessions or
stuart: would you flatout support romney s lower tax rates and fewer deductions. guest: that absolutely is necessary. if you take a look at where we are, we have the highest corporate tax rate in the world. people are complaining about jobs. this is just insanity. what we need to do is we have to drop that rate. a flatter, a flatter rate is better. stuart: i thought the tea party disappeared but we got cruz in new mexico, and a gentleman in indiana and you in missouri. guest: the tea party in month in is a very diverse group and they supported different candidates. it was more just a conservative, that was me, that won. stuart: when you say the tea party in month in has a lot diversion opinion, all kinds of republics? or acrosshe t board for the
tucker: why not stand up? standing up there is a difference between you expressing a view and the new providing intimidation and harassment to another student. tucker: if you are going to ban whiteboards, why stop there? why not ban pens and keyboards and other instruments of diversion opinion and just sort of suppressed speech and everyone would be happy? you are pretty articulate with a command so my precise command of the language. presumably an article this long, you could explain what action, what form that we take pride in this case, you say it takes flipping cars over. someone paid for those cars. those aren t your cars. to destroy someone else s property to make your political point isn t really a valid path, as it? first of all, they flipped cars second of all, tucker, i think it s an article. i exaggerated. i am trying to explain what i think i actually mean by political action that doesn t consist of sanitized or moderated q and a sessions or