tucker: why not stand up? standing up there is a difference between you expressing a view and the new providing intimidation and harassment to another student. tucker: if you are going to ban whiteboards, why stop there? why not ban pens and keyboards and other instruments of diversion opinion and just sort of suppressed speech and everyone would be happy? you are pretty articulate with a command so my precise command of the language. presumably an article this long, you could explain what action, what form that we take pride in this case, you say it takes flipping cars over. someone paid for those cars. those aren t your cars. to destroy someone else s property to make your political point isn t really a valid path, as it? first of all, they flipped cars second of all, tucker, i think it s an article. i exaggerated. i am trying to explain what i think i actually mean by political action that doesn t consist of sanitized or moderated q and a sessions or
tucker: why not stand up? standing up there is a difference between you expressing a view and the new providing intimidation and harassment to another student. tucker: if you are going to ban whiteboards, why stop there? why not ban pens and keyboards and other instruments of diversion opinion and just sort of suppressed speech and everyone would be happy? you are pretty articulate with a command so my precise command of the language. presumably an article this long, you could explain what action, what form that we take pride in this case, you say it takes flipping cars over. someone paid for those cars. those aren t your cars. to destroy someone else s property to make your political point isn t really a valid path, as it? first of all, they flipped cars second of all, tucker, i think it s an article. i exaggerated. i am trying to explain what i think i actually mean by political action that doesn t consist of sanitized or moderated q and a sessions or
you expressing a view and providing intimidation and harassment to another student. e tucker: if you are going to ban whiteboards, why stop there? why not ban pens and keyboards and other instruments of divergent opinion and just sort of suppressed speech and everyone would be happy? you are pretty articulate with a precise command of the language. presumably in an article this long, you could explain what action, what form that would take. in this case, you say it takes flipping cars over. someone paid for those cars. those aren t your cars. to destroy someone else s property to make your political point isn t really a valid path is it? first of all, they flipped cars second of all, tucker, i think it s an article. i exaggerated. i am trying to explain what i think i actually mean by political action that doesn t consist of sanitized or moderated q and a sessions orese institute of politics.