Justice and the associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. All persons having business for the honorable Supreme Court of the United States are advised to give their attention for the court is now sitting. God save the United States and this honorable court. We will hear argument first this morning in case trump vs. New york. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, this case should be over. Thatistrict court held illegal aliens would be shielded from her dissipating in the enumeration. But that is now over, and whatever existed has thawed. They pivoted therefore to possible future injuries but as of this very morning, career experts at the Census Bureau confirmed with me that they still dont know even roughly how many illegal aliens they would be able to identify, let alone how their number and geographic concentration might affect the course of it. And if they dont know, certainly the other parties in this case do not. The court therefore should follow the co
The hearing will come back to order. Senator klobuchar. Klobuchar thank you very much, mr. Chairman. Hello, judge. I want to start out again by reminding our friends at home, people at home, that this isnt normal, we shouldnt be here right now. We are in the middle of a pandemic and people are sick. We are in the middle of an election and people are voting. And here we are, stuck in a nomination hearing. I know what my constituents care about, what they have been calling and writing me about. And that is they are afraid of losing their health care in the middle of the pandemic. Peoples lives depend on the Affordable Care act like steve, a senior from minnesota who has a heart condition and relies on his prescription medication. Emily from minneapolis, her mom was diagnosed with breast cancer. Janet from rochester whose brother has a mental illness. Or christie, a mom from bloomington whose daughter had a tumor. That is what is on the line. Health care is on the line and judge, that is
Company and the Public Service, and brought to you today by your television provider. Day three ofrom judge Amy Coney Barretts confirmation hearing. This includes lessons from senator klobuchar, codes, and on thought. Among others. Thank you. The hearing will come back to order. Senator klobuchar. Sen. Klobuchar thank you very much, mr. Chairman. Hello, judge. Judge barrett hi senator. Sen. Klobuchar hello. I want to start out again by reminding our friends at home, people at home, that this isnt normal. We shouldnt be here right now. We are in the middle of a pandemic, and people are sick. We are in the middle of an election, and people are voting. And yet here we are, stuck in a nomination hearing. I know what my constituents care about, what they have been calling and writing me about. And that is they are afraid of losing their health care in the middle of the pandemic. Peoples lives depend on the Affordable Care act like steve, a senior from minnesota who has a heart condition and
Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, this case is about the respect for the courts precedent, four years ago the court held in holmes help the texas admitting privileges law imposed an undue burden on women seeking abortions. The louisiana law at issue here act 620 is identical to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial, the District Court ruled act 620 unconstitutional finding no material differences between this case and hold ems health. On burden it found the act 620 would leave louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time, it found the act 620 would do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision, the sixth circuit committed two fundamental errors in my first date used served the role of District Court and disregarded nearly all its factual findings. Second, the abaccepted legal arguments that this court rejected four years ago. Nothing, however, has changed that would justify such a legal
Case 1813 23 june medical services versus russo and the cost petition 1814 60 russo versus june medical services. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, this case is about the respect for the courts precedent, four years ago the court held in holmes help the texas admitting privileges law imposed an undue burden on women seeking abortions. The louisiana law at issue here act 620 is identical to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial, the District Court ruled act 620 unconstitutional finding no material differences between this case and hold ems health. On burden it found the act 620 would leave louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time, it found the act 620 would do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision, the sixth circuit committed two fundamental errors in my first date used served the role of District Court and disregarded nearly all its factual findings. Second, the abaccepted lega