law division to expose fully what was going on- was going on. so, did you turn around on was going on. so, did you turn around on receiving was going on. so, did you turn around on receiving this - was going on. so, did you turn around on receiving this letter| around on receiving this letter and say, know that it s wrong it is disclosable. is say, know that it s wrong it is disclosable. say, know that it s wrong it is disclosable. a ., ., ., disclosable. as far as i was aware, the were disclosable. as far as i was aware, they were notified disclosable. as far as i was aware, they were notified of disclosable. as far as i was aware, they were notified of the disclosable. as far as i was aware, they were notified of the other - disclosable. as far as i was aware, l they were notified of the other case at some stage. they were notified of the other case at some stage- at some stage. that is not the ruestion at some stage. that is not the question i at some stage. that is no
that is why i say i didn t know about bugs, errors or defects. nobody said that there was a particular bug or error or defect. that s what i am saying. no one has ever come or cascaded it down to see what particular book, error or defect was in the system. this kind of information defect was in the system. this kind of information is defect was in the system. this kind of information is presumably - defect was in the system. this kindj of information is presumably pretty pertinent to the case of ms mcdonald that you are charged with. prosecution, the criminal law team it was passed to them. you prosecution, the criminal law team it was passed to them. it was passed to them. you say it would be. it was passed to them. you say it would be. you it was passed to them. you say it would be, you didn t it was passed to them. you say it would be, you didn t say - it was passed to them. you say it would be, you didn t say it - it was passed to them. you say it would be, you didn t sa
you from phil taylor who is a legal executive in the criminal law division, could you score down, please. could you assist us with who phil taylor was. please. could you assist us with who philtaylorwas. i please. could you assist us with who phil taylor was. phil taylor was. i think he was a leral phil taylor was. i think he was a legal executive phil taylor was. i think he was a legal executive who phil taylor was. i think he was a legal executive who works - phil taylor was. i think he was a legal executive who works in | legal executive who works in worked in the criminal law team. does that mean he was. he worked in the criminal law team. does that mean he was. he might be a paralegal- does that mean he was. he might be a paralegal- does does that mean he was. he might be a paralegal. does it does that mean he was. he might be a paralegal. does it sound does that mean he was. he might be a paralegal. does it sound a does that mean he was. he might be a paralegal
person who comes first is the main interviewer? person who comes first is the main interviewer? yes. you are assisted there by a interviewer? ils you are assisted there by a colleague suzanne winter. where you the officer in charge of the investigation of miss mcdonald? yes. ~ , :, the investigation of miss mcdonald? yes. ~ , ., ,. .,, the investigation of miss mcdonald? yes. were you the disclosure officer in that case yes. were you the disclosure officer in that case as yes. were you the disclosure officer in that case as well? yes. were you the disclosure officer in that case as well? all yes. were you the disclosure officer in that case as well? all papers - in that case as well? all papers that i in that case as well? all papers that i had in that case as well? all papers that i had would in that case as well? all papers that i had would have - in that case as well? all papers that i had would have been - in that case as well? all papers - that i had would have been
sent to the lawyers. putting it siml . sent to the lawyers. putting it simply- you sent to the lawyers. putting it simply. you have sent to the lawyers. putting it simply. you have agreed i sent to the lawyers. putting it simply. you have agreed that| sent to the lawyers. putting it i simply. you have agreed that it was correct simply. you have agreed that it was correct for simply. you have agreed that it was correct for the intonation in the seema correct for the intonation in the seema misra case to be disclosed in subsequent cases because it was potentially helpful for the defence. therefore, in a case where the disclosure therefore, in a case where the disclosure officer was going to sign the disclosure form should he or she not ensure the disclosure form should he or she not ensure before the form is signed that the not ensure before the form is signed that the information in the seema misra that the information in the seema misra case that the information in t