Months have put Data Protection back in the spotlight join a crisis of this kind do we have to choose between safety and privacy while i talk about this with Richard Stallman Digital Privacy activist and the founder of the Free Software movement. Richard stallman Digital Privacy activist the sounder and later all the Free Software movement its such a pleasure to have you on our program once again while richard time so really changed and still last time we and jews folk and i have so many questions. Especially now that were in the middle of one of the biggest crisis our generations have faced in the past 100 years so is the coronavirus epidemic has shown that. Giant Tech Companies can use stand resources to help out in a crisis situation and thats undeniable i havent seen that well i mean i havent seen them help. Them remain saying that theyre doing right now is helping people spread insane lunatic rumors that are starting from the president of the us who is basically us the saboteur in
And then i carry my groceries back and this way i am not having data about me put in a database because the only data the only personal data. That isnt just about you that isnt a threat to you is the data that hasnt been collected is a distraction to talk about protection of data in the databases because the real way to protect your privacy is make sure the data isnt collected about what you do or where you go or who you talk with or what you say to them. So were going to be talking all the progress whether people should be choosing between safety and privacy but let me just. Not a choice privacy is part of safety remember one of the biggest dangers these days is political safety safety for instance from governments that are repressive or thora tarion and cruel and if the more they know about what people are doing the more dangerous they are collecting data is part of their technique for repression and then there are the movements anti Truth Movement such as you can find many governmen
Is r. T. International my names colleen brave welcome to world news and reaction from a sailor in the russian capital were going to start with some breaking news for you this hour coming into us of the new center a military plane with up to 23 people on board has crashed in the hulk over region of Eastern Ukraine 18 people are confirmed dead and 2 are said to be in a Critical Condition after suffering severe burns it was an antonov a n 26. 00 craft its a twin engine turbo prop aircraft widely used in the military and its said to have crashed while coming into land near the city of which is about 530 kilometers east of kiev Ukrainian Military sources say the had been 5 crew members and 18 cadets on Board Details are still coming in when we can come for more for you we will of course update you. Tor Headline News then a machete attack near the former paris headquarters of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo is being treated now as a terror incident 2 suspects have been detained there ar
We know that from the kilo case where Justice Scalia said when cuttingedge technology is used in that case to invade the privacy of the home then a warrant was presumptively required and the jones case suggested that even outside the home you might have an expectation of privacy against cuttingedge technology. In the end, the government is limited in its ability to record our conversations in public by state and federal laws, but the expectation of privacy test would have protected you against the laser beam. James, welcome to landmark cases. Youre on. Hi. When Justice Stewart delivered the opinion in court he took issue with the way the petitioner act tomorrow lated the questions which included a, whether a public telephone booth was a publicly protected area and physical penetration was necessary before search and seizure could be said were violations to the Fourth Amendment to the United States constitution. He added a couple of words in there. One was in place of right to privacy.
National conversation through cspans Daily Program or through our social media feeds. Cspan created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. All persons having business before the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to draw near and give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in partnership with the National Constitution center. Exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of different people who help stick together because they believe in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan landmark cases. Tonights case is katz versus the United States,