miscomprehension of the role of the department of justice. it is not his team. rod rosenstein serves the american people. the justice department is not donald trump s department. it is the american people s. second, it corroborates what jim comey has testified about, the loyalty oath that the president demanded of him. but it does not corroborate what rod rosenstein testified to. correct me if i m wrong, didn t rod rosenstein testify he had not been asked for a loyalty pledge. that s an excellent question. he did testify before congress that there was no loyalty pledge demanded of him. he may have interpreted somewhat differently when the president said are you on my team. he may not have interpreted it as a pledge of loyalty. he is going to have to explain the differences. there are six people. we have a graphic to show everyone, that have been asked for some sort of, call it what you want, an are you on my team question or a loyalty pledge of
with the investigation. rosenstein supposedly answered, we re all on your team, mr. president. technically right. he is part supposed to be on the same team. but this is another one. by itself, people will write this off as trump being trump. and a really ignorant idea about how people from new york speak. 0 to prosecutors, it could be a piece in a puzzle of corrupt intentions. why is he asking this question? what is he trying to get out of these executives. this is clearly part of a pattern. this is loyalty oaths part,000. sit not a verbal tick from a guy from new york. why not? this is how he divides the world. are you on my team or not? are you going to do a nice story on me. is he saying are you going to help me get out of this
memo? when do we get it? i think soon. i m hoping even next week. i know i talked to chariman nunes. he is committed to making sure the committee calls its hearing. we start that five-day process. i believe that the white house will give us the thumbs up right away. if that passes the committee with a majority vote, i think president trump will say, let the american people see it. he definitely brought up what i was hearing as well. there will be a vote next week. that s what i ve been told. after that, it goes to the president. i m sure he will allow that to go public. sean: i hear there s a lot more even coming behind that memo. do both of you glean that? yes. i think there will be more memos, sean. here s the other thing i think is important. why didn t rod rosenstein, when he testified just last month, why didn t he tell us they were missing text messages? sean: exactly.
bring him back. did he extend that fisa warrant? did he extend that? i can t get into who did what. i can t get into that. sean: my guess is he did. rod rosenstein came and testified and was asked about the text messages. that was the day before he testified was when we got the first batch of the strzok text messages. the fbi turned them all over. sean: he went into paul ryan s office begging not to release any of this. that constitutes the memo. dan bongino, last word. don t discount the name giancarlo either within the doj. he knew it was going on here in conjunction with sally yates. this is the connection that i take to the white house on this. he left under very suspicious circumstances. sean: i forgot to mention that in the timeline. it is an important point a crucial point, but i think an even bigger point now is that ratcliffe wants to interview b comey. interview comey. interview carlin. interview sally yates.
the day after president trump won the election. who is in the secret society? could it be page? strzok? mccabe? comey? bruce ohr? rod rosenstein? who is in the special secret society? aren t they supposed to be transparent? watch this. we learned today about information that after an immediate aftermath of the elections, there may have been a secret society of folks within the department of justice and fbi to include page and strzok that would be working againstks him. i m not saying that actually happened, but when folks speak in those terms, they need to come forward to explain the context in which they spoke those terms. sean: they said there s nohi concrete evidence yet that the secret society ever met. here s what we do know. n strzok and page and who we think is the deputy fbi director andrew mccabe were meeting about the insurance policy, just in case hillary lost election.