guilty. another individual has lost his job. many are you understand a cloud and the question is why? why does this keep happening? right. the time line. it is like when book something. here s another one if we re going back. what is suspicious about moving people from the room. a really significant fact is why would you kick everybody out of the office? the general, the chief of staff out, to talk to me if it was about something else? so that to me as an investigator is a very significant fact. when you look at that and you look at the overlap between the discussions in public about putin and then what we ve seen at certain levels of the campaign, what questions do you have left about george papadopoulos? well, of course, the big question about george
member ducked at her recent washington trip? tell us whether your companies targeting for russians did or didn t match the trump campaign s targeting. what have you learned between the oplap in targeting between the trump campaign and targeting of the russian accounts. targeting is broad. the overlap between the trump campaign and the russian accounts. targeting is something everyone uses. the trump campaign and russian accounts. you don t know or won t tell me? when the ads get released we ll also release the targeting for the ads. so, again, we re going to be fully transparent. come on! we are in the territory of questions on questions on questions. one of which is why won t she answer. if there is overlap and you didn t know, why not just tell us now. and mark, do you get why people are suspicious about all this? you run a cooperation. doesn t have automatic loyalty to any one nation. and the kremlin is not the only autocratic regime exploiting
money. no doubt. we had outside counsel. you said kick it up. i hear that. that makes sense. now we know it went to a campaign supervisor. he said these meetings were great work. and bloomberg saying he they approved the meeting. do you agree he that? no, i don t. i don t think it actually happen. i don t believe paul manafort would ever agree to any meeting and i ve heard that same leak saying 2 a secret meeting. i don t believe paul manafort would have ever agreed to that. he claims it was just being polite. i don t imagine under any circumstances that a person at such a junior level would bring such a cockamamy idea to a campaign and anyone with any sense would task that young man to do anything so stupid.
they don t know what to do. they have ty cobb in there. they re running out these people to be interviewed. if mueller real has his hands on the collusion case, the only way to save themselves is to attempt to blow it all up. you re not saying they re ethically right. no. you re saying strategically howard is saying they strategically understand if there s an existential threat, you don t want to cooperate with someone who may be trying to legally slit the throat of your organization and that is a view that this is too cooperative. so speak to that that he so intelligently laid out. if there is a collusion case and papadopoulos is cooperating, you have a report in bloomberg that he says a secret meeting was approved by the campaign.
foreign country? i think if i were contacted by an intermediary or a foreign country, i would have kicked it right upstairs and tried to make sure. would it send a red flag for me. but i ve been in politics for 30 years and papadopoulos had been in politics for 30 seconds. donald trump jr. was on his first campaign. so when these he entreaties come in, if you don t have the experience, you might not know what to do. so when he says, they got thousands of e-mails, and they have dirt on hillary clinton. you think he shouldn t have taken those meetings? you wouldn t have continued to talk to them? no. i think what i would have done is kicked it to paul manafort or other people in the campaign naflt typical campaign, especially for a presidential campaign, you have an opposition research department, a legal department sxfrlt we didn t have either of those in the trump campaign. you paid jones plenty of