Revealing anything privileged tomorrow or wednesday. And then spicer was deflecting on russias role by arguing that maybe election interference is more of an issue for Hillary Clinton than vladimir putin. Why Arent We Talking about the influence other influences on the election . Why Arent We Talking about Hillary Clinton getting Debate Questions ahead of time . Thats a valid attempt to influence an election. Spicer is citing an email there that showed a democratic operative on cnn appear to share Debate Questions in advance with clinton, an email revealed by the underlying russian hack. Now trumps aides would apparently prefer to take shots at Hillary Clinton than address the Foreign Policy dilemmas theyre facing right now. Its easy to see why. Its pretty easy to blame your competitor for everything. That is, of course, what 2016 was a about. But 2016s over. This is 2017. Its not a test. Its about to get much more difficult for donald trump. Joining me now former cia
operations office
the coverage in the papers that mps are quietly saying to sajid javid, the health secretary, that should he have been the health secretary, that should he have been imposing targets that the nhs has have been imposing targets that the nhs has to meet in return for this cash nhs has to meet in return for this cash. , , , cash. it s quite interesting, this sto , cash. it s quite interesting, this story. because cash. it s quite interesting, this story, because i cash. it s quite interesting, this story, because i certainly - cash. it s quite interesting, this i story, because i certainly reported in other parts of the country about measures to integrate health and social care. 0ne measures to integrate health and social care. one of the things that a lot of national. my recollection is it didn t create jobs at the top, it just is it didn t create jobs at the top, itjust involved forcing doctors in the social care managers in local authorities to sit down together and plan toge
like a shakedown but instead of getting something very valuable for the country it s pr valuable for donald trump. absolutely. these are in donald trumpian terms small potatoes. we re about to get the announcement on jobs. it will probably show 82 consecutive months of jobs growth, the old record was 52. we re close to 16 million private sector jobs under this administration. very few americans know that but everybody has heard about the 730 jobs that trump inflated to 1,1000 ohio and very few people know that was a deal that violated trump s own position in the campaign when he said corporate welfare, interest-free loans and other tax favors didn t create jobs, now he s the champion of them. donald is an absolute corporate chameleon and whatever makes trump look good no matter what
administration. very few americans know that but everybody has heard about the 730 jobs that trump inflated to 1,1000 hiohio and very few peop know that was a deal that violated trump s own position in the campaign when he said corporate welfare, interest-free loans and other tax favors didn t create jobs, now he s the champion of them. donald is an absolute corporate chameleon and whatever makes trump look good no matter what it costs companies, companies better line up and pay attention. corporate camillians. say that ten times fast. david cay hnston, thank you for joining us. who are they targeting coming up. and tonight s thing 1 and thing 2 starts right after this break. ,
up through the roof. and the other thing is you asked for solutions about the economic development and job creation. first and foremost, we have to get rid of these hundreds of millions of dollars, sometimes billions of dollars, of taxpayer subsidies given to big corporations, privilege at developers, who promise to create jobs. then through some of the audit stuff that i conducted, didn t create jobs. the bloomberg administration never checked back to see if they actually created the jobs they promised. the other thing we need to do is we need to help middle class people. we immediate to help working men and women take more take home more of their pay. would you believe that in the city of new york, we essentially have a flat income tax. something that s roundly rejected everywhere else in the country. you pay the same amount of tax. i propose a tax system that s far more progressive. i don t think we do have a fair flat income tax.