Revealing anything privileged tomorrow or wednesday. And then spicer was deflecting on russias role by arguing that maybe election interference is more of an issue for Hillary Clinton than vladimir putin. Why Arent We Talking about the influence other influences on the election . Why Arent We Talking about Hillary Clinton getting Debate Questions ahead of time . Thats a valid attempt to influence an election. Spicer is citing an email there that showed a democratic operative on cnn appear to share Debate Questions in advance with clinton, an email revealed by the underlying russian hack. Now trumps aides would apparently prefer to take shots at Hillary Clinton than address the Foreign Policy dilemmas theyre facing right now. Its easy to see why. Its pretty easy to blame your competitor for everything. That is, of course, what 2016 was a about. But 2016s over. This is 2017. Its not a test. Its about to get much more difficult for donald trump. Joining me now former cia
operations office
into a war with russia. there are no easy answers here, and not much need for a bunch of amateur arm chair strategists but as a matter of factual information about foreign policy dilemmas, you can see coming into view, many problems here. the harrowing scenes in ukraine have many people concerned about what they are their countries or alliances can do to help. the idea of stopping putin is appealing. the idea of a no-fly zone sounds to some like something that would be somewhat diplomatic or somewhat not escalotory but as described there, no-fly zone means you re ready to shoot planes out of the sky and therefore engage with russia militarily. this debate played out last night. our only hope, because the longer you go the more ricky it is, risky it is for the u.s., the more likely the u.s. would
deals with the trump organization, then we learn of two real estate deals in india. i only bring this into play to provide context for everything we re hearing about, about unethical dealings. what do you make of it? we re in the age of hypocri y hypocrisy. maybe that, too. it is a terrible idea. the president s company, a company he yeowns, doing deals l over the world, and raking in the cash. a lot of shady business deals they ve already been involved in. now we get yet more. and this is going to put the united states in jeopardy because we have very delicate foreign policy dilemmas in a nu number of places. india and pakistan, dealing with that situation is a challenge for the united states. and to have the president of the united states have economic exposure there is a serious conflict of interest. and i think that he is using
revealing anything privileged tomorrow or wednesday. and then spicer was deflecting on russia s role by arguing that maybe election interference is more of an issue for hillary clinton than vladimir putin. why aren t we talking about the influence other influences on the election? why aren t we talking about hillary clinton getting debate questions ahead of time? that s a valid attempt to influence an election. spicer is citing an e-mail there that showed a democratic operative on cnn appear to share debate questions in advance with clinton, an e-mail revealed by the underlying russian hack. now trump s aides would apparently prefer to take shots at hillary clinton than address the foreign policy dilemmas they re facing right now. it s easy to see why. it s pretty easy to blame your competitor for everything. that is, of course, what 2016 was a about. but 2016s over. this is 2017. it s not a test. it s about to get much more difficult for donald trump. joining me now former cia
that s a valid attempt to influence an election. spicer is citing an e-mail there that showed a democratic operative on cnn appear to share debate questions in advance with clinton, an e-mail revealed by the underlying russian hack. now trump s aides would apparently prefer to take shots at hillary clinton than address the foreign policy dilemmas they re facing right now. it s easy to see why. it s pretty easy to blame your competitor for everything. that is, of course, what 2016 was all about. but 2016 is over. this is 2017. it s not a test. it s about to get much more difficult for donald trump. joining me now former cia operations officer and a 2016 independent presidential candidate, evan mcmullen. what do you think of what we re seeing here and this bizarre inability to deal with what might be negative information about russia separate from what you do about it by the trump administration incoming?