Or, alternatively, trump can take his phone with him but his Defense Counsel has to babysit him to make sure he does not copy anything onto his phone. And if the defendant takes notes, regarding sensitive materials, the Defense Council must inspect those notes. It is sort of like the sats, only its all part of a federal criminal indictment. As the prosecution argued for that provision, they noted dryly and pointedly, trump has shown a tendency, a desire to hold on to material which he should not have. Yes, that is correct, trump was caught having taken more than 300 classified documents with him to his Florida Beach house when he left the white house. The reason this all had to be ironed out today is because Special Counsel smiths team is going to start handing trumps Team Evidence to review before they all go to trial. Those rules are part of a much larger protective order that judge chutkan ordered today, outlying what evidence trump cannot share from this case outside court. And we
Thank you for your coverage, my friend. You bet. Thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. Former President Donald Trump, former President Donald Trump got some marching orders today. The judge overseeing Special Counsel jack smiths case into trumps attempt to overturn the 2020 election, judge Tanya Chutkan, today she laid out some new rules for the former president , as far as the next phase of this criminal indictment. When mr. Trump want to go over sensitive evidence, like Witness Emails or Audio Recordings in his testimony, he is not allowed to bring anything into the room with him that could be used to copy that sensitive material. Like a smartphone, if trump is reviewing this material on his own. Or, alternatively, trump can take his phone with him but his Defense Counsel has to babysit him to make sure he does not copy anything onto his phone. And if the defendant takes notes, regarding sensitive materials, the Defense Council must inspect those notes. It is sort of like t
i said it earlier, you can choose your friends, you can t change your a senate committee investigated and found no evidence that billy carter had influenced american policy. and then there was neil, bush the son of george h. w. bush and, brother to george and jeff. during his father s administration, neil bush wound up getting sued by federal regulators for his alleged role in a banking scandal. and the president son, neil, must explain at a public hearing why he approved $45 million in loans for a business partner. i ve got nothing to hide. i ve cooperated fully, will continue to do so. my view is the sooner the better. neil busch eventually settled that case out of court, and then there where the clinton siblings. bill s brother, roger clinton, and hillary s brother, she iurato. both of whom got caught in alleged pay to play scandals during the clinton administration. roger carson was a musket of congress, but he was never charged. and more accusations this
brother of president nixon, who was known for trying to make money off his brother s presidency? as political magazine pointed out in 2015, richard nixon was so worried about his younger brother donald s willingness to trade the family name for business favors, and that early in his presidency he had the secret service put a tail on him and tap his phone. which is an amazing soviet way to deal with here or shady rather. there was billy carter, the colorful beer swilling brother of jimmy carter who created an enormous headache for his brother s administration when he got caught taking money from the from the government of libya. the shadow of billy carter s dealings with the country of libya fell across his brother s white house again today. in a news conference in new york tonight, the president s brother made it plain he was not happy about the statement made by the president. yesterday i don t agree, billy carter said, that was inappropriate for me to act on behalf of a foreign g
your commitment that flow chart and the detail with what she presented that to the american public. i think everybody in the audience thank you today as well. george, it does expose the utter fraudulence of the republican claims around hunter biden. i would also just say, i think it is important for the sake of history to point out in the number, that someone in a presidents extended family is involved in some unsavory, potentially sleazy deals to trade-off his former brother or cousin s reputation is not a new thing in american politics. that doesn t make it a good thing, but that calls for strengthening ethics laws, not necessarily, i m sorry, appointing a special counsel? like, why didn t billy carter and donald nixon and neil bush and roger clinton get special counsels? i wonder what you think of merrick garland s role in all of this. i think the problem is this is an extraordinary time. we have a sitting, the former president of the united states under indictment in four places.