refuted. if the prosecution knew the forensics were messed up, the federal examiner didn t do a good job, if they knew two out of three members could not identify the voice as trayvon s, if they knew the chief of police was excluded from the interviews and politicians had hijacked the investigation, you have to wonder if you re a juror sitting on this case, why was this prosecution brought in the first place? and the answer to that question is not a pretty answer. you think they re going to ultimately vote to acquit? looking at this today, as i said here today, yes. now, certainly the prosecution will have an opportunity to try to tie some of these loose ends up in summation, but summation is not evidence. it s not evidence. i mean, there are just huge, huge holes in the prosecution s case. diana, the jury keeps turning down breaks.
it in closing argument? right now we re getting a smear of it but i don t know that they have enough to get down and dirty in their closing. let listen to one witness who was particularly noteworthy, a friend of zimmerman s. his name is tom donnelly. he said he served in the war and was able to recognize the screams of people. he had no hesitation in identifying the voice. there s absolutely no doubt in my mind that is george zimmerman. and i wish to god i did not have that ability to understand that. diana, with that story, do you think that donnelly is a more credible witness about whose voice that is screaming on the 911 call than say zimmerman s mother or trayvon
been some big blows to the prosecution. right now we have trayvon martin s father trying to rebut a point made by officer serino. officer serino said trayvon martin s father initially said that it was not his son trayvon s voice on the recording and the father is saying that s not in fact what he said. how do you think that it plays with the jury? well, i think it places the prosecution in a terrible, terrible position. this is a classic scorch-and-burn defense. they are attacking every witness and they are attacking each and every bases upon which the prosecution claims this is a murder versus an excusable or justifiable homicide. and diana, what s your take on the day s events so far? certainly hearing from the people who love george zimmerman, it s hard to think of him not as a good guy at this
you mean zimmerman. hold on, the dispatcher says to zimmerman, are you following him? and at that phase, zimmerman says yes. and the dispatcher says you don t have to do that. and zimmerman says okay. and then he says he is running, we don t know if he s running toward him or running away. if you listen to jeantel, he s running away. i believe jeantel in that regard. diana. she don t have second degree murder without the jury believing every word out of her mouth. she is an acknowledged liar. totally discredited, so she s off the table. the state is going to have to prove this case without her. that s all there is too it. even if she isn t off the table, weren t discredited, not there, by telephone. she doesn t know who ran at who, doesn t know any of the pieces. even if she were a terrific
you mean zimmerman. hold on, the dispatcher says to zimmerman, are you following him? and at that phase, zimmerman says yes. and the dispatcher says you don t have to do that. and zimmerman says okay. and then he says he is running, we don t know if he s running toward him or running away. if you listen to jeantel, he s running away. i believe jeantel in that regard. diana. she don t have second degree murder without the jury believing every word out of her mouth. she is an acknowledged liar. totally discredited, so she s off the table. the state is going to have to prove this case without her. that s all there is too it. even if she isn t off the table, weren t discredited, not there, by telephone. she doesn t know who ran at who, doesn t know any of the pieces. even if she were a terrific