was doing my own deliberation was the nonemergency phone call. i did pick up on some things out of rachel jeantel s testimony. trayvon martin s phone records or her phone records, when they were talking. did you think rachel jeantel was credible? i did pick up some credible information from her. so yeah, i do think she was credible. now back to our panel. diana, if i were on the jury for this case, i would have found her testimony inconsequential. not particularly powerful for the prosecution and not harmful to the defense. that she was only there to sort of set a timeline. it s almost like the media, i don t know if they re sort of using her or making her into a different part of the trial than she was. your thoughts on her. well, i think the state of florida made her important because they really needed trayvon martin to be the victim of physical aggression first. and so the whole little get off, get off at the end of the conversation and the sound of
was doing my own deliberation was the nonemergency phone call. i did pick up on some things out of rachel jeantel s testimony. trayvon martin s phone records or her phone records, when they were talking. did you think rachel jeantel was credible? i did pick up some credible information from her. so yeah, i do think she was credible. now back to our panel. diana, if i were on the jury for this case, i would have found her testimony inconsequential. not particularly powerful for the prosecution and not harmful to the defense. that she was only there to sort of set a timeline. it s almost like the media, i don t know if they re sort of using her or making her into a different part of the trial than she was. your thoughts on her. well, i think the state of florida made her important because they really needed trayvon martin to be the victim of physical aggression first. and so the whole little get off, get off at the end of the conversation and the sound of
prosecution office. i can t get it shock and awe about this. i see it every day. i see affidavits much worse than this. jim hammer, if jim drafted that affidavit, it would be balanced and right down the middle. but one, legally they don t have to be balanced. you don t have to put in somebody s defense or theory. you don t have to put in fact that hurt you. we all know the law, greta. that s what it is. in answer to your question, yes, i think they re unsavory, but i have other examples of that. diana, it talks about how trayvon martin s mother identified the voice on the 911 call. it doesn t leave out the fact that the father was unable to do it in the beginning. it doesn t tell that. it also doesn t mention head injuries which might have bearing on whether or not there might be self-defense. do you have any problems with the way the prosecution team got this warrant? well, sure. and horrible wouldn t it have been if there were not depositions and the ability to get into what ha
diana tennis, jim hammer, bernie grimm and ted williams. ted, first to you because you sat through some of the trial. your thoughts? well, i sat through the trial and i have listened to this alternate juror. as a matter of fact, i think i know who this alternate juror is. i was very observant of the jury. i think he called it the way he saw it. i mean, he focus specifically on the injuries. he apparently you could see looked at the stand your ground portion of it as here. i don t have a problem with this juror, greta. look. the prosecutors and the defense had to present evidence to this jury. they presented the evidence. some of this evidence was very flimsy and to be candid with you, i don t believe some of the evidence should have come in but the jurors did their job, i believe. diana, you re also there listening to this jury thinking paid attention and weighing the evidence or irresponsible or anything else? you have respect for him or not?
and shame on anybody out there who s trashing this jury verdict and thinks that he can second guess it and say it s wrong. we should say thank you to this jury and jurors on every and appalling. maybe you don t feel the same way i do. hi, greta. i do. i have my own critiques about the law but they didn t choose to be there. they were picked by prosecutors and defense attorneys, sworn in we the judge. they deserve nothing but respect for what they did. on cases that i lost or didn t get the verdict i wanted, i d look at myself because i picked the jurors, i put on the best case i could. people ought to look at themselves like the prosecutors in this case and not attacking the defendant or these jurors. i find it despicable to attack the particular jurors. they were picked to be there. they didn t volunteer for the duty. deb, diana, i m upset with the attorney general of the united states. he s a lawyer. he fbi already said that they have investigated this.