Museum way. I think two modestsized project would work belter. So i dont mind the project asis. I mind how we got here and would like to understand that more. Commissioner moore i would be interested to know if any penalties have been levied. The other issue is, in 2013, to answer somebodys question and giv given direction at that time, the project wouldnt have been considered for demolition because we had clear direction that no units would be destroyed. Weve moved away from that a little bit for other reasons, but in 2013, there would have been no demolition supported on this property. Commissioner richards . Commissioner richards i move to propose an indefinite continuance until we get more information from dbi on their documentation and that it wasnt lawful. Second. I will only advise that indefinite continuance will require renoticing the entire project. Commissioner richards lets go three months. Very good. I think the project requires more time to come back here than three month
Wasnt according to plans . Yes. Why are these things happening . Im flabbergasted that this person can keep stamping plans and falsifying documents. I think that would be you can add that the staff can certainly add that to the information we get. Commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson i would like to support not a sixmonth continuance. It needs to be shorter. We need answers from the Building Department and hear this project and decide. I would say last week in february, february 28. 2 1 2 months from now. Commissioner richards lets stick with three months. Commissioner moore . Commissioner moore we can continue and the architect can tell us if or the staff. So theres an amended motion. Seconder is okay with march 15 . On the motion then to continue the matter to march 15 with direction from the commission. Commissioner fong aye. Commissioner johnson aye. Commissioner moore aye. Commissioner koppel aye. Commissioner melger aye. Commissioner richards aye. President hillis aye. Tha
Lawful. Second. I will only advise that indefinite continuance will require renoticing the entire project. Commissioner richards lets go three months. Very good. I think the project requires more time to come back here than three months, including redesigning at a minimum the conditions that the department had established, because i will not go against the Department Recommendation in front of us. Three months would put us at march 15 or april 12. Im okay with three months. I dont think its a complicated project or its a good test case for us to get understanding from dbi and their process and it may be that were able to use this as an example for if you dont agree to the three months, what do you propose . Commissioner moore i would suggest six months or if the architect is in the room, perhaps we could ask him. Who is the architect . Mr. Santoss name is on the drawing. If hes in the room, perhaps he could speak to being able to able to do the work required in that time. Commissioner
Happening . Im flabbergasted that this person can keep stamping plans and falsifying documents. I think that would be you can add that the staff can certainly add that to the information we get. Commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson i would like to support not a sixmonth continuance. It needs to be shorter. We need answers from the Building Department and hear this project and decide. I would say last week in february, february 28. 2 1 2 months from now. Commissioner richards lets stick with three months. Commissioner moore . Commissioner moore we can continue and the architect can tell us if or the staff. So theres an amended motion. Seconder is okay with march 15 . On the motion then to continue the matter to march 15 with direction from the commission. Commissioner fong aye. Commissioner johnson aye. Commissioner moore aye. Commissioner koppel aye. Commissioner melger aye. Commissioner richards aye. President hillis aye. That passes unanimously. Item 15 at 1233 polk was contin
To do any kind of history of classroom film, you need to understand the scholarship in a lot of fields, im going to be quoting and referencing and pulling together work that ive done, work thats been done by other historians of science. Film studies people. Communications studies scholars, even folk lorists. For reasons that should now be obvious, the topic is interdisciplinary. In particular were going to return to this question, right. What are the relations between art, science and entertainment and culture, in cinema . How do they reinforce one another in these particular contexts . Were going to see the movement of people, the same people across institutions, right, across media forums. And across science. So its all going to be kind of blending together. And also Science Education. Obviously in Science Education what students are taught depends on what the stateoftheart knowledge is for that period. We have to consider what is the scientific and technical knowledge. To understand