Housing project to have a good portion of this project appear to be corporate rental like we talked at 2200 Market Street. If we move ahead to do anything with this project i would require that we condition it to have my affirmative vote, that we limit the amount of Corporate Housing rental that could be on the project to some reasonable level. What is a reasonable level . 10 . Why not zero . Zero. Okay. Would that maker of the motion except that accept that . Before i second its, another question i have of the project sponsor. He put an offer on the table, i dont want to get into private agreements, they cant accept it due to their process. If we approve it does the offer just to stay there . Can you just let them have it . Let me say this. The offer through yesterday was still on the table, which was the same offer the group had accepted previously. Should the commission approve this project today, there is a 30 day appeal time frame, i want to give anyway tricks of the trades. There
In the last two weeks i have been conversations not directly between myself or the project sponsor, but there have been conversations were once again the deal was put in front of them, we are ready to go. We will sign it this morning, and our understanding is no. Thank you. I still dont understand it, because i took what we said here as a direct invitation for those parties who were present in the room to talk to each other. I have a lineal way of thinking about that. That was the people i thought i was talking to and that didnt happen. So i dont know what to say. I dont have any comment anymore on that matter. Thank you. There is a motion on the table. I will say, my strong directive was to go back and work with the community. I expected there to be that communication, different from the last time. We heard this, the last few times we have heard this, i have not received a lot of communication from Community Folks nor do i see lots of Community Folks here today. You know, obviously th
Behalf of 16 Community Groups and the commission knows this. The Development Team is also fully aware of this. Making a last offer here without talking to united to save the mission does not show respect for the community. I dont think it shows respect for the commission that sent us back to Work Together and talk. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi there. I am john jensen. A citizen of San Francisco and i support projects like this. I just want to be on the record that i support this project. Thank you. Thank you. Any other Public Comment on this item . Public comment is now closed. Mr. Kaplan, question. How long have you been out this at this entitlement . I believe this project has been on file since 2015. How long has active entitlement process been . For years now. Thank you. Any other comments, commissioners . Ill bring up the same thing about a plus time to vote for approval of the project. Commissioner richards. I opened this hearing and Commission Comment saying i
And Climate Impact, and i think working on wetlands and sinks is a good opportunity, and i think they should be happening in tandem. I appeal to all City Departments to cooperate, combine expertise and resources and search for economies of scale among climate solutions. Greenhouse gas emissions do not respect city limits, to coordination and strategy sharing regionally and locally are responsible. Engagement with residents and local businesses is nonnegotiatable. Neither we nor the planet can afford the exploiting of responsibilities outside of city limits. Our future relies on making sure that all people can access and afford 100 clean electricity, buildings, and transportation and on regenerating our open spaces and agriculture. We must respond as a team. I also want to say that i was really happy that the speaker from m. P. A. Mentioned the real need for getting people out of their cars and theres no reason able bodied people shouldnt take transit or bicycle, and i hope that all sta
Once again, thank you, again for all of your great work on this. We really appreciate it. Supervisor mandelman thank you again. Next speaker. Im ed gershin. Our actions are going to need to include Large Capital investments. When we say things like large transit for boats cant be addressed, we need to make sure that we have the p. R. Necessary in San Francisco to address those challenges. Also, in terms of housing policy, we need to be conscious that landlords may not be incentivized upgrade to renewable energy, and we need to either mandates or incentives to make sure that landlords are also upgrading the apartments that they control when its the tenants that pay for that. Also, we need to be cognizant of the land use of San Francisco and untalso of peopl that may not move to San Francisco because of those policies. And also, we need to have a lot of trees and ensure we have a sufficient tree canopy in San Francisco. Supervisor mandelman thank you. Next speaker. Hello. Im josh lee. Iv