Just outside the town, and those are the things im concerned to have you all been able to better coordinate with the First Responders and with the state coordinators, First Responders . We have. I have said to the railroads i think notifications of First Responders should be a priority, we have an emergency order that went into place in me 2014 i remain simplistic we have reiterated its importance with the railroads. Wrote them a letter reminded and expectation is there to be sharing that information with First Responders so that those individuals have as much information as possible. Are you getting pushback . To the states still say they dont have the info . It depends on the state. Some states have said they want more, were asking the railroads to please work with him to give them all of the impression they could possibly need. Some are satisfied, and then depending on whether that information is made public prickly depends on the state you put a working group together worked with r
Absolutely critical to its success. And, you know, to make this have it maximal imact which we end impact which we hope that it will have to change some of these graphs that yo see here on the right and the left, every component of that request is vitally important to the success of this endeavor. And so we will have some incredibly difficult choices to make if if we cannot get that particular request. And so i recognize that you have been an Ardent Supporter of the success of fisma, and we certainly are totally appreciative of the efforts that youve made to this point, and were very, very appreciative of the resources that did show up in the subcommittees and the full appropriation for fisma implementation. All i can say is that there will be some significant shortfalls that will result with that particular number which will make it very challenging for us to be able to put in place right from the get go what we need to do to be successful in this endeavor. Doctor, thank you very much
Incident, how would the preventive controls rule that we have just passed have made a potential significant difference in the risk of that disease . So thats an unusual case in many respects. In part because of the vast scale of the damage that it did and the thousands of products that had to be recalled because this firm was selling not only Peanut Butter in bulk but peanut ingredients that went out into thousands of processed foods. It was a catastrophic event for the food system. It also involved intentional conduct by the owner and operator of that facility and well publicized subsequent criminal prosecution and conviction. You know, the the what this will do even in that situation is provide a much stronger basis for inspectors when they go in to facilities to not be reliant just on looking around at the facility conditions and with no access to the records of the facility, now well have a much stronger ability as investigators to go into facilities and make assessments of the sys
Under the hyde amendment, zero taxpayer lawers, this is a matter of law that go into the abortions. The v. A. Program and medical health care, the government does work in the health care, and under the hyde amendment, zero taxpayer dollars go toward abortion. So this comes down to what do we think about the attempts the practical attempts to make it almost impossible for a clinic to get started that performs abortion. As long as it is legal and women want to exercise their legal rights, i think it is wrong to instead of trying to change the law, to try to do things like get rid of planned parenthood and the clinics that provide these things, that is the way to go about this. If you disagree with borgs, i respect that, even if i dont agree with it. But the fact of the matter is taxpayer dollars dont go to the performance of abortions. Obama care, by the way, also had a an exemption for churches. The catholic church, for example, which and and other religious institutions that oppose abo
Supplemental proposal we put out last year. But the whole idea is and this is following the congressional mandate the importer must have a program, a documented program where they have identified their suppliers, theyve come to understand their suppliers capability for food safety, theyve approved the suppliers, they know the practices is supplier is under taking and they look at records and they and under some circumstance, when justified by risk because its intended to be a riskbased foreign supply Verification Program we would envision the u. S. Based importer doing an audit. Having an audit conducted an on site audit of that foreign producer. So its having a real program that we can then audit and obviously go behind that and sample product when its coming in, go behind that and actually inspect the foreign facility if we choose to. But it thats accountability for the importer thats the new feature. The word audit has a different meaning than inspect, isnt that true . So when theyr