Anyone else want to give us a killer idea, maybe something that has already been mentioned once or twice . Maybe not . I think the improper payment act do not pay hold agencies accountable. When you are measuring that its going to hold them accountable to make it a priority. I also think electronic verification at the state level i think it has proven that those death reports are highly accurate and moving in that direction. I would agree with mr. Brune thats prudent and it would allow them to look at other verification processes that perhaps moves resources to those other areas and i go again to verification of family members and funeral homes. We look at some data of 82 corrections in 2012 and 13 and we pulled a small case sample 46 cases. 35 of those cases, those folks were in fact alive but what . 35 of the 45 pieces we looked at. They were erroneously placed in the file. When you look to the source of those reports it was family members and those are typically regarded as being hi
Mayors office. Mayors office, six months is fine. All right. Number 14 will not be implemented. Number 15 will not be implemented. Number 17 will not be implemented and number 18 will be implemented. Okay. So at this time i would like to direct the clerk and the budget analyst to prepare a motion that we made to update these to the recommendations. Is there a supervisor tang, did you make the motion. No, i did not, but i like to make a motion to, i guess update these recommendations. Thank you. Is there a second. Second. Excellent. Thank you so much. All right. Motion has been made and unanimously passes. Thank you. Okay. Were going to lose supervisor campos. Thank you for your services. Wonderful to have you. Dont worry everyone. Madam clerk, can you call item two and three together. Item number two is hearing on the recently published 20122013 civil grand jury report entitled Log Cabin Ranch planning for the future, a continuity report. Item number two is hearing on the recently publ
Risk. And how we dont have a balanced system focus on competitive markets. Host is there can well go through some of this specific examples and a think everybody who talks she probably has their favorites here but to you, what was the most egregious . What stands out to you as being the most egregious and tell us a bit about it. Guest the most single agreed to star in the book is about a man named rob manning. Bob manning was a 26 yearold lineman for the electric Power Company in upstate new york, niagara mohawk. And one day in february 1962, as he was coming down off a powerful, able to electricity got loose and he went headfirst into the pen, paralyzed from the neck down. I met bob in 1997 when he called the New York Times looking for help because he couldnt collect his Workers Compensation benefits, 35 years later. But thats not the egregious story i tell in this book. The really egregious story is the Power Company was sold. The Insurance Company that had his claim which is owned b
Report entitled Log Cabin Ranch planning for the future, a continuity report. Item number two is hearing on the recently published 20122013 civil grand jury report entitled Log Cabin Ranch planning for the future, a continuity report. Resolution responding to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations contained in the 20122013 civil grand jury report entitled Log Cabin Ranch planning for the future, a continuity report and urging the mayor to cause the implementation of accepted findings and recommendations through his Department Heads and through the continuity report. Resolution responding to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations contained in the 20122013 civil grand jury report entitled Log Cabin Ranch planning for the future, a continuity report and urging the mayor to cause the implementation of accepted findings and recommendations through his Department Heads and through the development continuity report.
The city of San Francisco and is Redevelopment Agency want to apply the then current obligation for replacing housing to those units that were destroyed before the obligation was in place and raise indicated that obligation was first adopted in 1976 and prior to that time the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency destroyed 7,000 units. The statute itself was not self executing. It requires a number of debts for the agency and the board of supervisors to take and also the state. The first step was for the department of california housing and Community Development to certify the exact number of units that the agency had destroyed and so in 2002, and 2003, they submitted documented to verify the number of units that had been destroyed in several of the older project areas. H cd found that 7,900 units needed to be replaced and that was part of the 2113 obligation. The legislation required that the board of supervisors adopt amendments to redevelopment plans acknowledging the replacement housi