insistence of this nebulous term that breitbart likes to use rather than saying they are supremacists, racists, neo-nazis. can we forget about the semantic differences? what is a difference between a white supremacist and a white nationalist? nothing. there s not a single sorry. go ahead, ryan, then brian i ll come to you. it s okay, i ll chime in after. okay, there really is no difference. white nationalism is ultimately an expression of white supremacy, which believes that the united states is fundamentally and originally intended for white people. you know, so white nationalism has since sort of morphed as a term into what we call the alt-right. brian, real quick, any difference between white nationalists, white supremacists, neo-nazi? it s the same corn flakes, different box. bottom line is, white supremacists are biological determinists, white nationalists are using slightly different
the shocking fact at the moment of murder. many americans are material determinists in any moral question or frightening conflict, a lot of people uncomfortable with the human element and like to fixate on the material factor, but the sad fact is that gun acquisition is probably the link on the killing chain least amenable to influence. we live in a country that already has something like 250 million guns floating around. it s hard retro actively to get a grip on them. what s interesting about the brooks piece is that he writes about all the elements of driving the crime rate down have been addressed in so many majorities with the exception of gun acquisition. something you said strikes me, taking place in the house and senate might overwhelmingly approve of universal registration. and they re above public opinion. i do think to his piece, though, that one element we don t talk about enough in this. i thought governor christie was
year in particular, it is going to be a whole lot of fun. there s really no sport, art, or spect call in the united states of america that can compete with presidential politics for sheer american entertainment value. when it comes to the question, though, of who will win and whether or not president obama is going to get a second term, the determinists among us determine however fun this whole process is, the process of republican party picking a nominee is irrelevant. the determinists among us tell us they don t even need to know the name of who the republicans the name of the republicans are going to choose for the nominee to predict the election results next november. the determinists among us say the only thing you need to know to tell us who is going to win the next election is what the unemployment rate is. no president has been reelected with a unemployment rate above 7.2%. that s what it was when ray kban was reelected. over 7.2 unemployment, no president has ever won himsel
nice. the process of picking a presidential nominee in either party frankly is always kind of fun. in this republican party in this year in particular, it is going to be a whole lot of fun. there s really no sport, art, or spect call in the united states of america that can compete with presidential politics for sheer american entertainment value. when it comes to the question, though, of who will win and whether or not president obama is going to get a second term, the determinists among us determine however fun this whole process is, the process of republican party picking a nominee is irrelevant. the determinists among us tell us they don t even need to know the name of who the republicans the name of the republicans are going to choose for the nominee to predict the election results next november. the determinists among us say the only thing you need to know to tell us who is going to win the next election is what the unemployment rate is. no president has been reelected with a u
i would like to explain, but that s it. no sourcing and nobody knows what they mean. nice. the process of picking a presidential nominee in either party frankly is always kind of fun. in this republican party in this year in particular, it is going to be a whole lot of fun. there s really no sport, art, or spect call in the united states of america that can compete with presidential politics for sheer american entertainment value. when it comes to the question, though, of who will win and whether or not president obama is going to get a second term, the determinists among us determine however fun this whole process is, the process of republican party picking a nominee is irrelevant. the determinists among us tell us they don t even need to know the name of who the republicans the name of the republicans are going to choose for the nominee to predict the election results next november. the determinists among us say the only thing you need to know to tell us who is going to win the nex