Some of the largest concerns are about the undefined terms and unaccessible day that we need to have to implement this code section. Were also concerned about the entirety of the penalties being collected, except for our time and material costs being diverted away from our Code Enforcement fund. Thats a fund that our department relies on to continue our Code Enforcement work in the first place. Most importantly, not being able to seek a permit for five years, if youre found to be in violation, we worry that may lead to buildings falling into disreplayer or Property Owners abandoning those buildings all together, if they determine the cost to legalize the work and wait to go through the new approval process isnt going to pencil. So going into all other violations of the planning code, which are handled through section 176. So it would increase the daily fine from up to 250 a day to up to 1,000 im sorry, to 1,000 a day. There would be no discretion, a straight 1,000 fine. And the board o
I think, ultimately, i do really like the idea of this house going back to two units, wanting to make sure that it actually is rented out and used as two units , but if a fellow commissioner wants to weigh in, i will pass the microphone. You can see we are a couple commissioners short tonight, and we are not going to be able to literally come to a decision with four votes. I would feel better if the d. R. Applicants had a little more information regarding the sun study and had more time to review it, but also, i see the need for the expansion, but also see the possibilities for the excavation and staying within the envelope. I will make a motion to continue this. I will continue it for a month. I think a month is adequate. To the project sponsor and the. Just to be clear, we are asking them to share the information about the sun study, also explore other alternatives about relocating the expansion through excavation as opposed to adding on that extra story on top, correct . Correct. Mr
Bond funding are senior citizens. Theyve lived there 30 years and have very low rents and are in danger of losing housing. In addition, we are preserving the communities at sunnydale a and potrero, preserving the housing for those households. Theres many intergenerational families at those locations, so with respect to the bond level, thats what we were getting at. I think it would be great to put that in the report so that people would have a sense that there was some delivery of the issue that was raised. Thats a good idea. We will do that, and we will also add i think in prior bond reports, we talked about the switch of funding from one project to another when it happens, but i think thats a good idea just to keep it moving in all the bond reports just so as people look at it freshly, they may have forgotten, and we can make sure that thats clear. Thank you. Thank you. Theres a larger issue besides specific to this bond, which is how this bond fits in to overall Housing Needs in a c
Commission and we expect joseph duffy, senior building inspector representing the Building Department inspection. The Board Meeting guidelines are as follows. The board requests you turn off or silence cell phones. Please carry on conversations in the hallway. For jurisdiction request, parties get three minutes each and no rebuttal. People affiliated must include comments within the three minute period. Members have up to three minutes to address the board. Please speak into the microphone. To assist the board, you are ask but not required to submit a speakerrer card when come up to speak. Speaker cards are available on the left side of the podium. Own three votes are required to grant a jurisdiction request. This women be rebroadcast on friday, july 26. It can be downloaded from sfmovetv. Org and now we will swear in or affirm all those who wants to testify. If you intend to testify at any of tonights proceedings and wish to have the board give your testimony evidentiary wait, stand i
To the liquor stores, and they have sent decoys to my store in the past three months maybe five times. And we have always refused to sell to minors. We have always refused to sell to minors. Youve already banned the menthols, and the flavors of the ecigarettes, and now you want to ban the regular tobaccos . This is not fair to the Small Businesses. We need to survive in the city, and there aren a lot of big businesses in the city. You want my family to get out of the city . I think this is not fair. Thank you very much. Clerk thank you. Next speaker. Hello. My name is jason, and im a San Francisco Business Owner and been a resident the same amount of time and parent of kids in sfusd who have experience in regards to this jool epidemic as you say. In my experience, i opened a tobacco shop without selling tobacco. Over the time, i was introduced to Electronic Cigarettes and the possibility of this being a cure, or if not, a cessation device to smoking. I did my research, went into it, pu