Experience in the building for the management showing a pattern of neglect, i who wholly oppose this construction in the building. Ive constantly complained about mold and mildew in my bedroom, and my stove and oven not working properly. Not only did they do nothing, but they didnt acknowledge my email. Currently im dealing with darkness in the Building Hallway leading to my apartment since september because they wont change the broken light bulb. That one i asked for twice. Earlier this year, i asked them to do something about the overflow of garbage our building seems to have leading to mice outside my ground floor apartment, and their solution was to ask all tenants to keep their trash inside their homes until trash day, when the bins were empty, and then you could take your trash out. I had a building inspector come in and say my stove is not up to code, and is missing parts, including a fan that makes it safe. Because of the missing part, if i try to move my stove at all to clean
Mcmansion . How is it in the best interest to tear down a modest housing or how is it in the best interest i have no problem with this guy building modest housing, but five levels . Finally, ask the commission not to reward the project sponsor who refused to rent or acknowledge and fought to keep this unit off the book with permission to demolish rental housing and building something that we all know will never be rented, will be only for the 1 of the 1 . Thank you. Thank you, next speaker. Please. Hi. I agree with the tree on the castro, as someone who rides that bus all the time. Its difficult for me to understand how this project meets the criteria of protecting the relative affordablity of existing h housing, which it must meet as part of the granting of the cu. Demolishing a structure that may or may not have a small unit on the site, and creating a huge singlefamily home that will sell for many millions of dollars does not protect relative affordablity. If this project was to pre
Boone boo boons and potentials, it breaks my heart. This group consistently shows us that they do not care. This Management Company is the reason we need laws protecting renters. The information and examples given today paint a clear picture of centrons pattern of neglect and their abdive abdication of their responsibilities. Heathers stove, its who are identifying to me that they would neglect Safety Measures around gas lines. They do not care. Several of us have had repeated leaks from overhead pipes and plumbing. When they finally did send their inhouse handyman to help with the water bubble on my ceiling, they refused to address the under lying issue as, quote, water was no longer gushing from the ceiling. They do not care. Ive alerted them to mold that has been in my bathroom that has been there since i moved in. Ive repeatedly asked them to replace the caulking to prevent water damage to the wall behind my tub, and theyve ignored follow up. During inspection, nancy mar had said t
Including a fan that makes it safe. Because of the missing part, if i try to move my stove at all to clean behind it, i risk the possibility of breaking off a pipe and having a gas hazard. When the building inspector moved it so i could show him the state of the wall and the floor coming up behind it, we could smell more gas coming out and see the spills behind the stove. The building inspector told me to be very careful with this until this can be addressed. Ive had this appliance in my kitchen for nine years with no knowledge that it was unsafe, as tenants we shouldnt have to take it to a legal level just to enforce or basic rights to live in a maintainable level. They collect our rents every month but wont maintain the facilities under the law. Im concerned with the current state of the building, that when they go to demo right underneath my living space, things will crumble or fall apart. The current state of the building is unsustainable and adding two new apartments will only mak
Or how is it in the best interest i have no problem with this guy building modest housing, but five levels . Finally, ask the commission not to reward the project sponsor who refused to rent or acknowledge and fought to keep this unit off the book with permission to demolish rental housing and building something that we all know will never be rented, will be only for the 1 of the 1 . Thank you. Thank you, next speaker. Please. Hi. I agree with the tree on the castro, as someone who rides that bus all the time. Its difficult for me to understand how this project meets the criteria of protecting the relative affordablity of existing h housing, which it must meet as part of the granting of the cu. Demolishing a structure that may or may not have a small unit on the site, and creating a huge singlefamily home that will sell for many millions of dollars does not protect relative affordablity. If this project was to preserve the existing structure and create a new larger dwelling unit within