so that affected, i think, the way that they charged. but i would also say that when we won the war, and the war ended, and we sort of moved on as a country and started doing all the other stuff that we needed to do in the post war period, i actually think that contributed to all that sedition defendants and all their betters in congress being let off the hook. people thought, hey, in terms of nazis, we went over there and fought them there and beat them and that threat is now over and we don t want to think about it. so these people who didn t get successfully prosecuted by the justice department sort of melt back into the sauce of american extremism. and in some ways, they ve haunted us ever since. here is one from pesci s poll. it s not a real name. one of those twitter names. what would you think is the number one take away for doj if they listened to the ultra podcast? which, i m sure they are.
uncompensated. grassley is asking what d.o.j., fbi and the u.s. attorney have done to investigate. the fbi has not responded to our request for comment for grassley s allegations. the white house is declining to comment and referred us to the justice department. harris: around and around you will go as you cover this. mike emmanuel, thank you very much. jason rant, seattle radio talk show host is in focus with us. senator grassley is really pushing in and getting a lot from the whistleblower but also from those piles of evidence that he has questions about. yeah, i think they are all valid questions. every one would give the justice department sort of the benefit of the doubt as we recognized lot of these things take a very long time to investigate.
you say? i think people are questioning the legitimacy of the fbi and the justice department because they see unfair standards being brought. whether that is the case or not i don t think the justice department sort should pursue president trump the first time any former president would have been charged with a crime. in fact the first time for a president has had a house searched. it should be for mishandling classified information. and she said, past officials that have had proms with that have been let off with misdemeanors i think what s going on here is the justice department is trying to send a message to president trump that there is a lot more coming down in the future around january 6 and that investigation and both sides are flexing their muscles to show they re going to try to drive a tough one when it comes to those investigations for it. we can t forget there is a
수능 D-50 앞으로… 취약 부분 보완하고 강한 부분 다지며 컨디션 관리 metroseoul.co.kr - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from metroseoul.co.kr Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the distinct possibility that barr was willing to weaponize the department of justice to go after trump s political enemies, that s where we are now, so chris, the other major issues what the biden justice department is going to do about this. so far, we ve seen this pattern of protecting the trump justice department, but that starting to look more and more the same as protecting corruption. this is the institutionalist paradox that i think garland finds himself in, right? which is, some of the norms eroded by the department of justice i think two of them where the independents department sort of taking orders from the white house directly, and secondly, abandoning continuity and how departments did it s just business and the continuity in the position it took and the cases it took. we want to restore those norms,