public comments of current senior white house officials describing these communications in january of 2017. and i believe that she wrote to the justice department, she asked for permission, the new justice department, asked for permission, the justice department sort of said the buck stops at the white house. so her attorney sent a letter to the chief counsel at the white house, and then said, the letter from her attorney said, if i do not receive a response by monday march 7 at 10:00 a.m., which is when she was supposed to testify. i will conclude that i can testify and the hearing will go on the same day? the point is, she still has ethical obligations, it s not just a privilege, she s a former prosecutor who has access to that s going to embarrass an
that we should be very clear when the attorney general said that the department of justice has made certain recommendations, those aren t necessarily just recommendations. the ferguson police department and municipal courts will have to reform. this is a must do situation. we re talking about wholesale reform. if they do not what specific reforms could we expect and how will those are reinforced? if they do not agree to those recommendations, then they will be sued by the justice department so these reforms will happen no matter what. the results are the same so we re hearing things like training to ensure officers don t use bias in policing officers should practice community policing police stops should focus on community safety those are just some of the recommendations, but to be clear, they are, the justice department sort of uses the word recommendations, these will they re mandatory. these will be mandates and i would be surprised that any of the leadership remains.