Agree with them . We have not received a copy of those measures. Okay. When was the last time you had a meeting with the folks in the Marsh Community . Good evening, project sponsor. We met with the marsh directly after the dr meeting. We proceed actively went over and investigated some issues that they had on the property, some roof drainage issues and we also retained their sound consultant to come up with a report that should be floating around here with the Planning Department somewhere. We didnt find any issues with the sound. The building formally was a nightclub. Back in 86 and 87 he received some complaints and on two occasions he pulled permits to do the soundproofing. All the complaints we heard tonight about the fees ability of the marsh is groundless because there is no reason they can do that now. There is open space in the back. There is Large Service area for the restaurant where the recycling goes on at night. That does not interfere with the performance now. The condit
That was drifting from other units into their apartment and they were totally at a loss of what they could do. This is basically a right to know ordinance. This would inform prospective renters where smoking is allowed so they can make an informed decision and choose to decide on an all terp tiff if they dont want to be exposed to the second hand smoke. And supervisor mar, i think you talked a little bit about the 2006 Surgeon Generals report. One thick that was in the report, even short term exposure can be dangerous to cardiovascular health. In addition to sending out letters to the building land lords and managers what our Department Plans to do is to do two mailings because there will be first the apartment owners with 50 or less units who will be phased in as the first phase, so well do a mailing to notify those owners and then subsequently on second mailing to inform the other apartment owners of the larger units and we also plan to have a web site with questions and answers and
Been under taken to respond to noise concerns. A couple questions, what do you response to the proposed mitigation measures that the marsh has presented . Do you agree with them . We have not received a copy of those measures. Okay. When was the last time you had a meeting with the folks in the Marsh Community . Good evening, project sponsor. We met with the marsh directly after the dr meeting. We proceed actively went over and investigated some issues that they had on the property, some roof drainage issues and we also retained their sound consultant to come up with a report that should be floating around here with the Planning Department somewhere. We didnt find any issues with the sound. The building formally was a nightclub. Back in 86 and 87 he received some complaints and on two occasions he pulled permits to do the soundproofing. All the complaints we heard tonight about the fees ability of the marsh is groundless because there is no reason they can do that now. There is open sp
Chronic diseases, people with hiv, people with cancer and heart disease, who had just moved into their apartment and had no idea they were going to be exposed to second hand smoke that was drifting from other units into their apartment and they were totally at a loss of what they could do. This is basically a right to know ordinance. This would inform prospective renters where smoking is allowed so they can make an informed decision and choose to decide on an all terp tiff if they dont want to be exposed to the second hand smoke. And supervisor mar, i think you talked a little bit about the 2006 Surgeon Generals report. One thick that was in the report, even short term exposure can be dangerous to cardiovascular health. In addition to sending out letters to the building land lords and managers what our Department Plans to do is to do two mailings because there will be first the apartment owners with 50 or less units who will be phased in as the first phase, so well do a mailing to noti
We proceed actively went over and investigated some issues that they had on the property, some roof drainage issues and we also retained their sound consultant to come up with a report that should be floating around here with the Planning Department somewhere. We didnt find any issues with the sound. The building formally was a nightclub. Back in 86 and 87 he received some complaints and on two occasions he pulled permits to do the soundproofing. All the complaints we heard tonight about the fees ability of the marsh is groundless because there is no reason they can do that now. There is open space in the back. There is Large Service area for the restaurant where the recycling goes on at night. That does not interfere with the performance now. The conditions are going to be even better as my counsel mentioned we are replaced the 2 x 4 wall in the former kfc building with an 8inch thick concrete with a wall. Its like a bun ker. In. The feeling that there is going to be noise is complete