I would like to thank those in the bay area who in supporting those projects. My neighbors and i agree. The project is listed in a town that is to lower income chinese families and immigrants. Up until this recent sale this project was offered by the demographics. We are curious as to how this story luxury penthouse wrapped in floor to ceiling windows can be desirable. This is completely out of context with the surroundings. Casting a permanent shadow that leaves many homes. Perhaps this is why the sponsor has not showed the rendering. Instead the sponsor has provided a series of maps highlighting other properties. Over half of these examples are completely different than the subject property and higher limits. The sponsors own exhibits for conditional use. Commissioners, you have over 50 neighbors who have gone on record as stating that no opposition to the sponsor adding a unit otherwise increasing the height and bulk of this property this can hardly be considered antidevelopment. Th
Involved shooting where theres a in custody death or whether the officer is a witness or is the subject of a misconduct investigation is for those members of the working group perhaps not appropriate for the officers to review the recording before writing he or she report certainly after the writing give a supplemental if necessary if you have expert testimony or a those folks who are very well versed and experts in the area would suggest there is a potential of tainting the statement not intentionally monopoly is suggesting the misconduct on the officers part but the human part you think youve found something i want to emphasis there are 3 limited circumstances. Im sorry. It is pie role tonight. So thank you so much. Further Public Comment there hearing none Public Comment is closed. In my colleagues have a chance to ask questions i know there are members of the working group i want to provide that opportunity for folks might have questions for captain moserer or others ill open up fo
Are you asking for item 7 . Im asking for 7 to be continued to the same as item 5. Should you take up that matter until it is called. We have not called that item. So i have to wait until midnight for that . Depends on the commission. Its equivalent now of 10 45 p. M. In terms of a meeting. I have been here since noon. So i am telling you right now, audience, that you cant do the 5footers except together because the ones one is issues, there are five more coming and you have one on south of market. Youve had a lot of that today. So i will wait until midnight. I would like to make the same request. The promises made we are going to stick to the continuance calendar. I know everyone is tired. I will call items 12345 at this time. Good evening, my name is john, the owner of the property at 3029baker street. I would like to respectfully request that we just stick to the agenda which is to continue to october 1st. This project has been discussed for 20 months. In other words our meeting wit
Here. Hillis. Here. Johnson. Here. Moore. Here. Richards. Here. And for the recreation and Park Commission. Buell. Here. Low. Here. Lef. And mcdonnell have an excused absence. Thank you, commissioners. Under your special calendar, please note that the joint commissions will hold one public hearing for the public to provide testimony on all items listed below, including consideration of whether to certificate the eir. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission will consider action on certificating the final Impact Report and the recreation and Park Commission will act jointly to consider raising the shadow limit for the park, and the Recreation Commission will consider making a recommendation to the Planning Commission, regarding the possible, adverse effect on the park, and following action on those items. The recreation and Park Commission will adjourn. And the Planning Commission will remain in session, and separately consider, action on all other entitlements. Item one, c
Well recommended to the project sponsor that they follow through with a market octavia statistics recommend that the department continue to work on the stabilized building we have a time of first Building Permit pulled a snap the string 1, 2, 3 year look back and final occupancy to over time to see whats happening id like assume those include the necessary amendments tattoos eradicate sheet we missed items a23 f which is the shadow and the general plan amendments. I thought we did that. No weve not done that twoshgs e and f. Open to any other maemgsz anyone else has commissioner about the reporting the da requires annual rollercoasters on the parcels. Outside the sud. Oh, i misunderstood so at the time of approval a 1, 2, 3 year map so that will be effective and larger economic forces but try to look at this project it is a good learning experience so outside of correction. Id like this map. Stabilizetion map. So commissioner richards a point of clarification your third item with respe