The signage requirements. So i think perhaps the condition that the project sponsor would further work with on the department on the location of the signage. Its my understanding of this use that there are distinctions between each of the locations even though its formula retail, thats part of the nuance of it that they do make distinctions between the different locations. Okay, working with staff, we already have our guidelines as lights and things. Okay. Excellent. Commissioners, condition no. 4 under design, it does say signage, any signs on the property shall be made to comply with the requirements of article 6 of the planning code if what you are asking for is that project sponsor shall continue to work with staff, we can add that language to that condition no. 4 thats already part of the motion. Yup. Okay. That works. The next two bullets having to do with the sidewalk. Normally a project sponsor applies to the department of public works for permits to use the sidewalk, and so i
Just reiterate that you know, rh 2, this comes right from our planning code, which includes these statements, these statements are devoted to one family and two Family Housing with two large flats one occupied by the owner and the other one for rental. This proposal does not match whats defined in the rh 2 class use of rh 2. There are plenty of options to meet this. And refocusing back on the property we lost, this was a property next to the museum and you can see this is what our property will look like, this will be 22 ord, 24 ord, this will be the top on state street and the other side of state street. Its going to be sloping up the hill, im sure there are dimensional differences and this is a preview of what we can look forward to. This is the plot plan again from the project sponsor. I just wanted to point out what that means for a little bit of yard in the middle. You can see this is concrete wood and concrete and the open space in the middle of the rear yard is not much of green
Theyll all have these little pieces. President cindy wu wonderful. Well open up for Public Comment. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. I want to thank you for the presentation. Really looking forward to the piece of art. City clerk thank you, commissioners, if there is nothing further well move to item 8. This is the Environmental Impact report. Please note the draft eir is closed. It closed on september 29, 2014. Public comment will be heard however comments submitted may not be included in the final eir. Thank you commissioners, second and commissioners, rachel Planning Department staff. Im joined by my colleagues and senior environmental planner and preservation technical specialist. Members of the project sponsors are also present. The item before you is a certificate fiction of the final impact reportish for the proposed indiana street project. The project side is located on the west side of indiana streets, assess oris block 4105, lot
Or person per block then your Service Levels are different for all different facilities, streetscapes, parks. We might be coming back to you to talking about how the Capital Planning committee is interested in using that information to do our overall city capital plan for all infrastructure. How do we think about the upcoming residents and growth. The second piece, i think we do actually get to thinking about if bill is higher density. That bill is generating more demand for transit and contributing at a higher rate. The per square foot is a proxy for number of people or number of jobs, either residents or jobs. If you look at the eastern neighborhood fees you will see there is tiering where there is a lot of value and we allow the buildings to get very dense, people are paying at a higher rate and the financial fees ability is greater to contribute on those sites. Okay. I think what i was getting at i got from what you were saying what im getting at is i still feel there is a hanging
Alternate roads. You have the great bus street, there is plenty of room, they can get where they have to go and going in the other direction, they can go on fourth even though the subway would be underneath, they can still run buses on top of there and ultimately they go on embarcadero. This is a good street for walking, a good street for some traffic, but if you are doing all these things then probably the buses are going to turn it into total grid lock because its one of the streets that services the area down by the ballpark and beyond. So those are a couple of my concerns with this plan. The other thing im concerned about is where you square off the corners, you make it harder. Cars used to be able to go to the right and get ready to make the right turn and allow traffic for buses to continue to go after but now that you square it off, they are stopped there and they make a turn on red without moving to the side. I think its even more dangerous for pedestrians in that way because i