ultimately, chuck schumer decides how and which amendments will get a vote and debate and a vote, and i think he will be for us to go through that process because there have been demands, especially from republicans who winds amendments that they are amendments that they are amendment get a vote. and it s really about screen time, it s about getting a little bit of spotlights. it this is the issue that we care about. it s not really about whether those amendments will pass. but it s really about we are going to make a point of this issue, it is pegged into a very important to vote. everyone will be watching. everyone will be listening. so that some of the process. after all of that has wrapped, then you will move to the full senate for a vote. [30 the full senate for a vote. do ou the full senate for a vote. do you think the full senate for a vote. do you think anyone could hold up the vote in the senate? if you think anyone could hold up the vote in the senate?- the vote i
more thorough old time look, carnival look. that was like a half food want . it s like a three-ring circus. you ve got a lot going on. that s when you are like, so i have to say we found the evidence. you looked pretty good with a mustache. sean: evidence. this is game on because i have pictures of your hairdos in the 80s. laura: [laughs] those are priceless. let me say home perms any day. they re going to make a comeback. sean: they probably will. laura: the chemicals. sean: well done. there will be retribution. laura: thank you. this is why we do the shows. hannity, thank you so much. thanks for being a good sport. i am laura ingraham. this is the ingraham angle from washington. thanks so much for being with us. despicable joe. that s the focus of tonight angle. just when you think the white house couldn t be more shameless, they surprise you and take shamelessness to the next level. lest you think everything in politics is just a reaction to donald trump,
What weve been discussing w today, which involved in a regular channel, was a request that went against u. S. Policy that have have undermined the rule of law and our longstanding policy goals in ukraine, as in other countries in the postsoviet space. Those policies which were indeed championed by ambassador yovanovitch. You also testified on october 15th in the deposition about fundamental reforms necessary for ukraine to fight corruption and to transform the country. And you t cited the importance reforming certain institutions, notably was investigating President Trumps political opponents a part of those necessary reforms . Was it on that list of yours or indeed was it on any list . No, they werent. In fact, historically, is it not true that a major problem in the ukraine has been its misuse
of prosecutors, precisely to conduct investigation of political opponents. Thats a legacy i dare suggest from the soviet era when, as you stated in your testimony, prosecutors like the kgb were
In the Mar-a-Lago case, prosecutors attempted to stop Donald Trump’s vitriolic attacks on law enforcement and wound up themselves threatened with sanctions.
are you people look at me and say why are you always an optimist? because are you always an optimist? because i are you always an optimist? because i know as an american, tomorrow because i know as an american, tomorrow will be better than todav tomorrow will be better than todav i tomorrow will be better than today. i had to be an optimist, that today. i had to be an optimist, that every day i woke up and said that every day i woke up and said maybe today the change his mind said maybe today the change his mind. maybe today he would want to put mind. maybe today he would want to put the mind. maybe today he would want to put the country first. maybe today to put the country first. maybe today he to put the country first. maybe today he would want to meet. but he today he would want to meet. but he never did. not until our entire but he never did. not until our entire conference past the hilt entire conference past the hilt the entire conference past the bi