hearing though now said to determine whether an independent third party will be appointed to review some of the documents the fbi obtained from trump s mar-a-lago. u.s. district judge, aileen cannon, a trump appointee has ordered a hearing. she has already signaled that she could be inclined to grant trump s request for a special master. she has also given the doj until tuesday to file a public response to that request and present a more detailed list of items taken from mar-a-lago. julie ainsley, more with us. he thank you for joining us. let s talk more about what this means for the doj s review of documents. the possibility of this third party being appointed. that is right, yasmin. that would mean there would be another party reviewing these documents. of course, this is already a pool that the justice department wanted to keep a small as possible. we also know now that the director of national townsend valant. going through the documents, figuring out what should have
More ammunition, as Well Ammunition to be fired from those powerful himar rocket systems. More abrams tanks as well, or abrams tanks which will be on the ground in ukraine, we now understand, from next week. Specifically, though, it didnt include those atacms longer range missiles. Remember, president zelensky has been calling for those saying they will be necessary, particularly with regards to efforts to retake any land in crimea. Lets hearfrom our ukraine correspondent James Waterhouse who spoke to us from kyiv. I think the main prize is behind president zelensky in the us because it is america which spearheads the Western Allies in terms of military support, humanitarian aid and financial packages. Yes, it is right that there is a sizeable Ukrainian Community in canada. Prime Ministerjustin Trudeau is also a loyal ally to ukraine. Weve seen him here in kyiv make several visits, and canada itself provides its own packages, but they are dwarfed in comparison to what the us can and is
hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are sonia sodha, chief leader writer at the observer and tom newton dunn, chief political commentator with times radio. welcome back to you both. so let s start with some of the pages we already have. the metro writes that the eu has threatened to take life saving covid jabs bound for britain after blaming the uk for what it calls the continent s creaking vaccination rollout . the financial times also leads on the vaccine roll out, writing that the nhs s targets are in peril after a significant reduction in supplies. the telegraph adds that vaccine shortages mean that no more first appointments for covid jabs will be booked in april as supplies arriving in britain continue to be disrupted. the times adds that a fall in provision from astrazeneca is understood to be the reason why very few people will receive their first doses next month. the guardian writes that people under
university professor says the possible appointment of a special master, everyone is going to read into this order more than they should. a special master is not litigating the warrant or the search. he or she would simply making sure that the seized materials the government is holding on to our material said it has a right to possess. what do you make of that? yes, i think that s right. other than this delay problem which i think is a national security risk, a special master is not problematic for the government s case. they would simply review it and make a determination as to whether there was anything in there that properly belongs to the donald trump and the government should not look at. i would suspect that they would get what they need. if there is a passport in their, or document protected by attorney client privilege they will get the. the justice department had already proposed a filter team. they had proposed other fbi agents on related to the fbi investigation to do this
time to look through it all and digest it because some of these things are happening behind closed doors? that s absolutely right. and i think there s so much we still need to go through. i think there s a line byline, page by page that all of us need to look at, make sure we actually know what they re trying to introduce. but i m still sure there s access issues. i m still sure there s a way to restrict people from voting, and that s exactly what we don t want to do. one of the things that governor abbot sorry, we re having a bit of a delay problem. one of the things governor abbot said he would do if you didn t fall in line was dock your pay. is that happening? well, governor abbott can say and do whatever he wants, but the most important thing for us to do is protect voting rights and democracy here in texas, and that s what we re going to do. so he can say and do and act however way he wants about the political platform. for us as democrats it s about protecting voting righ