definiti definition. it s one tenth, more than a third, a half or roughly two thirds? we will tell you the correct answer. capitalism in america, the history, this takes the reader through the history of the american economy, ending with provocative thoughts about america s declining productivity, declining risk taking and declining dine ammism. the answer is c. the world reached a tipping point for the first time in history. over 50% of the world s population, 3.8 billion people are living in middle class or wealthy households. they point out new middle class is mostly asian. 90% of the next consumers will be in asia. this is good news for some and it means more than half the
meeting? this complete verifiable denuclearization? there s been nothing like that written into the document shared with the public, in either english or korean. in fact, what they seem to have done is taken north korea s definiti definition, denuclearization of the korean peninsula and mashed it together with the american call for complete irreversible veri dismantlement. by vaguely coming up with two that neither group fully agree on is kind of risky territory to be in. because it s very easy to create the kind ofnderstandings that may lead to a failure soon. malcolm, it strikes me that the president had a lot of things about this meeting that he could crow about, that were ground breaking, that were interesting and for better or worse and lots of reasons we ve heard from members of the bush administration and the obama administration, this sort of meeting didn t place. to set that out there and saywe toward something that could be good and making the world a
continue, i don t care what the judges say. that s called contempt by definiti definition, by the way. and this is supposed to be a law and order presidency. i don t agree. hold on, congressman. if you don t agree with him, then you agree with him being convicted of the crime because that s what he was convicted of. not necessarily. it was a contempt order. he then said through his lawyer that he unintentionally violated the law. it was an unclear order. i know this is his lawyers, but joe arpaio had a chance to do it the right way and he didn t and he boasted about it. now you re defending his flouting of the law. why? i m saying this, i don t agree with him for defying the judge s order. we also should remember judge snow issued an order that was judge-made law, and it wasn t consistent with federal statute and there s nobody that can quote a federal statute, a law, against what joe arpaio did. and he said mistakes were made. that s how he defined what happened. but i don t
again, that s a legislative question. they would leave it in place? it s a legislative question, not an administrative question. now, in one of your budgets you had a proposal that would allow states to throw what you called able-bodied people off of medicaid unless they were working or looking for work or in job training. people with addiction behavioral health, mental health issues, are they able-bodied in your definiti definition? well, we weren t as specific as what the definition was. the fact of the matter these words i m asking you now. what did you mean when you said able-bodied in this provision. there are many individuals that have worked in this space for a long time who believe that providing for an opportunity for individuals who are able-bodied