you have to be ever vigilant about it. you can say i think it s overapplied as a political slur. but to say something flat-out doesn t exist when we have evidence of it, it makes you sound like you re just not ready. don t forget we have these republican candidates standing on a debate stage, essentially falling all over themselves to kowtow to donald trump, who himself stood on the debate stage and spoke directly to the proud boys and told them to stand back and stand by when he was president of the united states. so the idea that all of these candidates had the opportunity standing on the debate stage this week to say in unquestionable terms that they will not carry forward this ideology of dog whistling and overtly carrying forward white supremacy in their politics, and they didn t do it. and that is appalling, but also that s frightening, and it will continue to be, i think, a huge piece of this race as we move forward too. but your debating point is that if you have supported
but they ve had some iffy results and they had a bit.. playing today against canada, which finished 0 0. can t read too much into it. i think all but two of the 23 players in their squad featured at some point. australia really fancy themselves. brazil have had a coach who s swedish, who s won the world cup as a coach in the last four years. and there s a new generation. they re feeling pretty bullish. the canadians, the french, they re. the french have already stated they re aiming for at least the semi finals. so there s a lot of confidence flowing around this. competition from the top nations. and i think the world cup needs that unpredictability, that debating point. who s going to win it? five players, five people in a room,
years. i think it was your second contributor saying the bank of england are actually causing this, and it is so true, and i think most people are waking up to this reality, that by putting up interest rates is actually causing the real inflation. the exterior factors, rates is actually causing the real inflation. the exteriorfactors, for instance, the war that putin started, gas and oil prices are actually back to where they were before, so. i5 actually back to where they were before, so. before, so. is a little hand grenade before, so. is a little hand grenade for before, so. is a little hand grenade for you, before, so. is a little hand grenade for you, liz - before, so. is a little hand grenade for you, liz truss i before, so. is a little hand i grenade for you, liz truss was. debating point, liz trust was right you want to deregulate in order to stem growth to counteract the interest rate rises? because high taxes were contributing to the financial crisis most households wer
his advisors committed crimes so that s no longer a debating point. what matters now is whether garland has the resolve to place all that damning evidence before a jury and whether that jury could be convinced that trump broke the law. those are strategic issues garland must consider, just as he must weigh the political consequences of taking trump to court. in the end, though, garland s primary responsibilities aren t gauging what kind of jury pool he ll encounter or how it will ripple across magaland. garland s core duty is to charge trump for the crimes he committed and let the judicial process run its course. i agree with that. i know you agree with that. sitting here today, are you more confident that garland that this is right and that garland sees the world this way? are you more confident than you were yesterday, the same level of confidence? or i don t think it will be less confident, so it s one of the two. i mean, look, i think that the band-aid s been ripped off, and w
at which you use those two words, like myself , was a very significant moment in post war british history, because i think it gave a lot of other people confidence. in january, 1988 while taking part in a debate about the controversial section 28 bill which inhibited schools and local authorities from promoting homosexuality, mckellen finally went public in his own characteristically nuanced way. so, you would like to see clause 28 disappear? - i certainly would, it s offensive to anyone who is, like myself, homosexual, apart from the whole business about what can or cannot be taught to children. i probably thought, this would be a good debating point and it was, and i seem to remember that he shut up, really! oh dear, oh dear.