Is that entire issue being determined in those proceedings . Not determined because the proceedings have been stayed. But three states have challenged that issue is what is at issue there . Will you finish describing the issue . I really didnt hear it. K 466 says a correction must be made in the same manner, end quote, as decision being corrected. Epas approval went through notice and comment and because of that k6 requires they go through notice and comment and corrections here did not go through notice and comment. Heres no disagreement between commissioners and respondants on that point. The United States tries to get out of that by saying they can use the good cause exception in rule making that sounded the administrator procedure act. That doesnt help epa at all because the requirement comes not from the administrative procedure act. The requirement from notice to use comments is from k6. It doesnt help epa rely on an exception to a statute when the statute does not impose the req
Conversation with some of your points and the points on the panel. You touched a little bit with resource scarcity and the economics of that. They seem to suggest that the increase in immigration is essential, particularly for high skilled workers. The Panel Suggests for every high skilled worker job that is added, teed up to three local jobs for American Workers are toed in that area two three local jobs for American Workers are added in that area. It suggests that americans are not taking the jobs anyway, so the only way to combat the lower skilled workers to bring immigrants. Ants onanted to hear your take some of those points and if you feel like your arguments are matching that conversation. Topliness the easiest response to that is that you should not take the argumentation of employers with needing more immigrants or more foreignguest workers as necessarily representing the factual situation because of the fact that they have a vested interest in expanding both temporary guest w
Birds from nesting in capitals. When we started this project, there was a major water event in of 1990 that deposited a large amount of water on the floor of the rotunda and it was through our investigations that we discovered bird nesting materials and debris from eating dome was what clogged the gutter system, caused the water the interstitial space and cascade into the rotunda so weve taken on a series of projects since that time to ensure that the drainage system is never compromised again by debris and it led to the development of the master plan and the study of the iron work and to the project that were now going to get completed years. Next two [captions performed by national captioning institute] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2014] on the next washington brandus looks at president obamas relationship with the press and his administrations goals for 2014. Then Jonathan Bialosky discusses apprehended from the border will be removed from the country. That, Ri
Federal Health Care Benefits to be tested for drugs. For our first 45 minutes, talk about the details of the case. We want to gain your thoughts on the topic. Heres how you can reach out to us on the phones. The numbers are on your screen. On our social media channel, you can reach us on twitter, facebook, or email. As far as the polling, we posted a question must night. There is responded this morning. For those taking it, 75 say that yes, people should be tested. No,t 594 people said welfare recipients should not be drug tested. You can leave comments and participate in the polls if you want. Join the conversation there. Make your thoughts known on twitter. If you want to give your thoughts and comments on the phone, please use the numbers provided. A little bit about this case. The decision was made on new years eve. Here is the reuters writeup grid the judge struck down the law requiring Drug Screening for welfare recipients. He says it by leaps it be constitutional protections. Ri
I have worked on sovereign debt my entire life. It is a fundamental lyrical economy problem. The ability to play a is not the issue as much as willingness to pay or fairness as you have it. I think these are very important things. Let me pick a more monday in area where perhaps mundane area which is measurement. We talk about were gdp is. You have to understand that we did not even have this construct until it really started this with the commission and the 30s. At 21920 ninecked and economic historians have looked at it more sense. At 1929 and economic historians have looked at it more sense. It is considered there is a High Standard deviation around it. There are conceptual issues you hear about like intentional investment where you reorganize offices or firms, perhaps retraining people in ways that do not show up in gdp. They are a lot like investment. We do not measure them. Another issue where measurement is that it isem very, very hard to properly measure the inflation rate. The