so as people we need to figure out what is the most important part to listen to. the streaming was talked about. changing kind of the venue of museums and making them participatory, unveiling the snobbery, making it a conversation in politics and journalism, talking, you seem to people, your listeners asked messengers really. but how do you view the creation of classic journalism? i mean, what is going to live on in your lifetime? which pieces? the story. especially being part of the world we always focus on the story. it doesn t matter if you read a book or you ready to eat, if it is not something one way or another it s not going to stick around anywhere. i always tell my fighters that whatever you do, make sure you able to stand by it and say this is the best thing i was able to do in whatever form your eye. so going on twitter and facebook, i don t fire things off randomly. and make sure everything i do precisely. there s twitter where you have 140 characters or somethi
publisher so bloggers were terrell made and i suspect few people run facebook. things have changed. this year walter isaacson spoke about digital media and is up in remarks and we have been given hashtag for the life tweeting panel. every person from roundtable has developed a robust digital strategy for their brand. if you re listening to the leaders on that roundtable six years ago you might not have seen pitchers give up the impending disruption but there were emerging leaders in that crowd that year that could ve told you not only that massive change was going to calm but that it was our day already happening just outside the digital field of the industry powerhouses. you have calm to hear the best ideas of the moment that the session is going to be a little bit different. today we are going to start with the best ideas of next year or the year after that. the four people you are here from today are already established leaders in their field. they re also the carriers o
talks about google earth. this is one hour and 10 minutes. good afternoon and thank you for coming. welcome to the panel on visualizing our future through the lens of big data. i assume if you took the time to come here after lunch you are a big day that freak like me. data freak like me. i got the chance to meet with three amazing guys who are doing phenomenal stuff. they will show you some really great data visualizations that will blow your mind. before we jump into that, i think first i want to let you know who they are. then we will do a lightning round about what is big data anyway. first, ed parsons is the chia spatial technologist at google. geo spacial technologist at google. google maps, google earth, and a google maps for mobile. anybody who has click on and hovered over their own house knows how exciting that little bit of technology is. google earth, he is essentially building a telescope for the planet which is a good idea if you try to get your head and
last year. the tally of the world s largest automaker is a complicated one. it has to be debatable. from twitter guest: ford is an interesting case. ford is an interesting case because they hit their price point well before the other two. if you look at the article not from last year s contract round, but before that, everyone looked at ford as the weakest of the detroit 3. in four years they went from weakest to the strongest very rapidly. the reason why ford did not need a bailout is because they were able to, in 2006, at able to take over $23 billion in loans in order to execute a turnaround plan, a one-point turnaround plan under alan mulally. this is two-plus years later when they went to washington and asked for a bailout, but they were able to look at the figures and realized they did not need that money the way gm and chrysler did. you are right. of ford was able to do this because they hit the crisis point some much earlier than the other two. another important p