the federal grand jury in miami is still investigating the mar-a-lago case and in recent days the grand jury has issued subpoenas to a handful of people who are connected to the inquiry. now we don t know who receive those subpoenas or what kind of information prosecutors are after, but post indictment investigations can result in additional charges, including charges against new defendants. well, now. joining me now is danya perry, former assistant attorney for the southern district of new york. danya, great to see you. thank you for being here tonight and helping me as well as everybody else understand exactly what the implications were our of the special counsel s investigation continuing forward with new subpoenas. is that it s interesting to you as to the rest of us? it s interesting. it s not atypical at all. once charges are initially filed and the original indictment, the grand jury
you know, now they tell a story. it made me realize, we ve been thinking about this, waiting on this for a long time, and as these details have been trickling out, we ve had this aha moment, as better people have, this is going to happen, because now it s not just, oh, the elements are mad, there s a narrative. there s a story that s actually very compelling. essentially that compels, i think the department of justice to bring a case that would ve been brought along time ago against just about everybody else. danya, when you talk about the obstruction piece, because i think we ve got the most the reporting around that. is there one thing that stands out to you as the smoking gun? is it the audiotape of trump admitting that he knows he had declassified these documents, the security camera footage of players moving boxes in and out of the storm, is it the draining of the pool that floods the i.t. room, with the
very compelling. essentially that compels, i think the department of justice to bring a case that would ve been brought along time ago against just about everybody else. danya, when you talk about the obstruction piece, because i think we ve got the most the reporting around that. is there one thing that stands out to you as the smoking gun? is it the audiotape of trump admitting that he knows he had declassified these documents, the security camera footage of players moving boxes in and out of the storm, is it the draining of the pool that floods the i. t. room, with the security camera footage, is it the audio diaries from emma corcoran, trump s lawyer on this? is there anything that stands out is particularly agree just and unavoidable legally? can i answer all of the above? it s the coming together of all of these facts. i know that a lot of these prosecutors personally, they re the best of the best. of, course this is the most sensitive case that s ever been brought into this
have been decided in dominion favor because of the judge s decision on friday so what this does is i significantly limits foxes ability to mount a defense and leaves for the jury the ke question of whether or not there is enough evidence t show that fox hosts producer and executives knew what the were putting on the air wa false or at least recklessly disregarded information showin that it was false and that i how you get to potentially significant and sizeable judgment against fox news. danya is asking for one poin $6 million and appears tha unless this is settled which i think it s highly unlikely a this point, it has always been pretty unlikely because fo appears to be preserving its options for an appeal here and this is going to head to the jury and it will be one of the