donald trump continue ha success in persuading thousand of followers to fill the capital. will they break into mor government buildings and use force to prevent any prosecutions of their hero i think not, such a failur would show that his once powerful hold has waned. relentless is shriveling towar impotence. interestingly enough danya placement were all told to sho up in uniform on friday mornin but there was no thing, ther is not apparently anything that does not mean there wil not be random acts of violence across the united states what was surprising was before you and i were on air together on thursday night. tucker carlson had said on his show and response to a guest saying that republicans should be very worried. he said this is not the time for you to be giving up your ar-15s so, i am worried that there is some effort to feel arme resistance or violen resistance there will be blood, they r going to be people who believe
i don t want to make an accusations about what the trump lawyers may or may not b doing, as danya, said there is an ethical duty by a lawyer to represent a client in thei best interest. and if they believe that there is some conflict they re supposed to get themselves out of that situation. , so a client can have zealous representation,. i don t know if it s going, on all we heard from cassid hutchinson about her representation does sugges that it might be part of the memo that donald trump engages in but as a prosecutor you just want to buttoned down anything where there might be a littl escape valve so there s no way out once you bring your case surely, and who knows wha those lawyers are doing with their clients. the fact that trump affiliated super pacs are paying for th means that somehow trump mus think there s some skin in the game in terms of having hi folks play for their counsel he s not known to be a prolifically generous presen bubble set that side for a minute evan cor
and uses for fundraising, an to claim victimhood angr events but it s still needs to be distracting to a candidate schedule you can t have a rally if yo need to be in court. and once he has a rally a court. which is not out of the real of the possibility when we tal about donald trump danya, the new york times ne reporting about the defensiv that trump may be testing ou as a pertains to potential indictments. already did an excerpt fro that reporting according to two of trump political allies, the campaign the trump campaign, will aim t portray any charges as a coordinate of offensive by the democratic party against trump who s trying to become only th second former president to win a new term after leaving office specifically, his campaign tea plans on trying to connect mr.
it s effectively, each - insurance policy,? write the feds, the doj ar saying we re gonna neutraliz you as a defense meant b calling all of you in, maybe trying to do their own form of insurance by having counsel, they re paid for council are present these witnesses. is that s what s happening here? i don t want to make an accusations about what the trump lawyers may or may not b doing, as danya, said there is an ethical duty by a lawyer to represent a client in thei best interest. and if they believe that there is some conflict they re supposed to get themselves out of that situation. , so a client can have zealous representation,. i don t know if it s going, on all we heard from cassid hutchinson about her representation does sugges that it might be part of the memo that donald trump engages in but as a prosecutor you just want to buttoned down anything where there might be a littl escape valve so there s no way out once you bring your case surely, and who knows wha those lawyers
for the southern district of new york and barbara mcquaid former u.s. attorney for the eastern district of michigan thank you for being with me this morning. danya, in terms of the what seems unusual to me at least and hon its face, this notion that the person who is under investigation has his affiliates paying for the counsel of other people who may be important witnesses in that very same investigation. is that unusual and, if so, what does it suggest to you it s not atypical and it s not inherently nefarious you see third parties paying all the time legal fees for witnesses or defendants, it could be a parent, it can be a company which is required to indemnify one of their directors or officers. here, as you pointed out in your introduction, it s more akin to a mob boss paying for the underlings so that they will fall into line, and we saw that in really excruciating detail in