before we begin, i just want to be sure we received word that there may be folks here tonight who intend to disrupt our guest. i share your view. and frankly, i d be surprised if that were to happen. i ve had the opportunity to participate in every single one of these events, and this hasn t happened. but i think you will agree that this audience would agree that there is no place here for the cancel culture. this is a place where free speech thrives and as president reagan wanted a place for real debate. good evening, everyone. i m roger, director of the reagan institute. as you probably know, they instituted some of the reagan foundation washington, d.c. just across from lafayette park from the white house. in about a week or so ago we had our grand opening, so we are 100% ready for every single one of you to visit us in washington, d.c. as is our tradition at the library, in honor of our men and women who defend our freedom around the world, please stand and join me in t
them through an open door between his office and if there s. you will also hear blunt talk. i want a report of the number of people that signed the day he died. if i cannot ever go to the bathroom i won t go. i promise you i won t go anywhere. i will stay right behind these black gates. funding onto the c-span and app or wherever you get your podcasts. host: for the next hour we will talk about the issue of religious liberty, particularly as it stems from cases heard by the supreme court. two guests running as for this conversation get daniel suhr is with the liberty justice center. he serves as their attorney. it is a nonprofit law firm. we are not a religious liberty law firm. but the two cases we are going to discuss today have important implications not just for people of faith, but all americans because they go to the heart of the first amendment. in one of the cases they go to the power of parents to make choices in education. in the other, i think it really a
though the two cases we are going to discuss today have important info implications for all americans because they go to the heart of the first amendment and many cases they go to the power of parents to make choices in education, and really affect the first amendment for everybody. host: rebecca joining us on zoom . freedom from religion foundation. a little bit about your organization in the position you take on these things. the freedom from religion foundation is a national nonprofit organization based in madison, wisconsin. we have over 35,000 numbers across the country, and we work to defend the constitutional principle of separation between state and church, and to represent the rights and views of nonbelievers. host: let s start with you. we heard several cases at the supreme court, religious freedom being the center of them. if you look at those cases collectively, how would uss where the court is when it comes to issues of religious liberty? i think what we ar
host: for the next hour we will talk about the issue of religious liberty, particularly as it stems from cases heard by the supreme court. two guests running as for this conversation get daniel suhr is with the liberty justice center. he serves as their attorney. it is a nonprofit law firm. we are not a religious liberty offer them. but the two cases we are going to discuss today have important implications not just for bill faith, but all americans because they go to the heart of the firstmendment. in one of the cases they to the power of parents to make choices in education. in the other, i ink it really affects the first amendment for everybody. host: rebecca markert is with the freedom from religion foundation. a little bit about your organization in the position you take on these things. the freedom from religion foundation is a national nonprofi organization based in madison, wisconsin. we have over 35,000 numbers across the country, and we work to defend the consti
we take you live now to capitol hill where that how science subcommittee on investigations and oversight holds a hearing to examine how the use of biometrics impacts privacy. we seem to have lost our signal from this live event. we hope to resume our live coverage shortly. , likely the primary reasons because he wanted it full and was angry they were not letting people through with weapons [indiscernible] offstage tent. i was in the vicinity of a conversation where i heard the president say something to the effect of i don t f care that they have weapons. let the people in. take the f mags away. host: you can see the whole thing on our website. we will show you other portions as the morning goes on. paula, silver spring, maryland, republican about the january 6 hearing. caller: good morning. [indiscernible] the question no one is answering is why did this happen in the first place? this is not an endorsement of anything that happened. if you wish, condemned the ac