electorate gets to see when they get to decide who runs this country. i m glad to see democrats like ro khanna be equally concerned as folks on the right, because this goes far beyond partisanship. this is a 1776 question, not just a 2032 republican versus democrat question. bryan: another damning revelation was the reason why hay chose to incensor this story. it was predicated under their hacked materials policy, but internal e-mails show there was a real discussion about that. they didn t have proof that this should fall under the hacked materials policy. bring up this information from the reporter in this tweet. they say they just prix lanced it, is freelanced it. hacking was the excuse, but within a few hours pretty much everyone realized that wasn t going to hold, but no one had the guts to reverse it. vivek. that was a downright lie. it turns out if there was a hack, there should have been all kinds of other steps including reporting to authorities and otherwise that were not
for impeachment moving in the other direction. moving more towards the president. so i think the white house wants to find out a little bit more about what chairman nadler envisions. but right now, it seems as though they re disinclined to do a full participation. ali. hans, thank you. hans nichols for us at the white house. and the new york times piece wasn t the only damning revelation. new testimony transcripts from an office of management and budget official, mark sandy, reveals how intense the withholding of that ukrainian aid was for the office of management and budget. this was part of his testimony, his close-door testimony. according to mark sandy, the withholding of that of that money was part of the reason why two omb officials resigned. including one official from the omb s legal department. sandy also provided even more revealing context to the timeline of the aid and then there s this. he testified that the white house chief of staff, mick mulvaney, notified him tha